Laserfiche WebLink
TO: City of North Olmsted Officials. <br />During a meeting of the City Council it was stated the Stearns Row development project <br />may be consistent with the 2025 Master Plan. It seemed as if this Plan was largely used <br />to justify the appropriateness of the development proposal. In response, the plan was <br />studied and it was surprising to discover, in my opinion, quite the opposite is true. <br />Chapter 3 which deals with Land Use and chapter five which with deals with Housing <br />were the areas of focus. <br />In the Executive Summary under "What the Public Had to Say" section, point seven is <br />of particular significance. It indicates the public wanted to promote historic <br />preservation! This in itself should end the discussion if the people who have invested <br />their lives and money in this City matter. Since public input was sought, it would seem <br />reasonable their interests would be reflected in the formal plan. Point eleven states <br />historic areas are emerging priorities. Point twelve indicates there should be <br />encouragement to preserve and renovate historic homes. Who would want to follow <br />these guidelines if their district becomes unstable? Old homes are expensive to maintain <br />and the people on Butternut accept this because of the character of the Historic District. <br />Point thirteen indicates residential development should occur in appropriate , defined <br />areas. Not in the middle of a Historic District. <br />In the "Key Findings: section, point seven indicates neighborhood identities are <br />important to solidify a sense of place and community pride. This point is repeated in <br />chapter 3, point seven, Core Principles of Smart Growth. A profound sentence for sure. <br />The sense of place on Butternut is like no other within the City. A walk down Butternut <br />and Canterbury almost allows one to forget they are in a modern developed City. Every <br />house is different. People have bought their houses on Butternut for a specific reason <br />that is not compatible with the inclusion of new housing stock along with a zoning <br />change. We fear a cascade of development will follow. <br />The introduction to chapter three, Land Use, states zoning is used to regulate land uses <br />to ensure harmonious and compatible development in the City based on land use <br />patterns adopted and incorporated in its comprehensive plan. The proposed development <br />in the middle of the Historic District is neither harmonious nor compatible. <br />In chapter three, Land Use, when the plan does reference development, it points to open <br />areas at the west end of the City. Section 3.1 c states work to assemble vacant parcels in <br />the western limits of the City near existing industrially zoned land for future <br />development. Developing parcels on Butternut does not appear anywhere in the plan. <br />The future Land Use map shows no such development on Butternut Ridge Rd. This <br />