Laserfiche WebLink
? <br />. ?.: <br />CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED <br />ORDINANCE N0. 85- 66 <br />BY: <br />AN ORDINANCE AUTHORIZING THE ISSUANCE OF A DUPLICATE BOND AND <br />APPURTENANT COUPONS TO REPLACE A CITY OF NORTH OLMSTED, OHIO, <br />SEWER IMPROVEMENT BOND, DATED MARCH 1, 1972, WHICH BOND AND <br />COUPONS HAVE BEEN LOST, AND DECLARING AN EMERGENCY. <br />WHEREAS, the Council of the City of North Olmsted, Ohio (the Council) <br />has been presented with affidavits of Edward J. Boyle, Director of Finance of <br />the City, and John Rirby, Authorized Signature of Morgan Guaranty Trust <br />Company of New York, New York, New York, evidencing the loss of a certain bond <br />and certain coupons attached thereto issued by the City, such bond being a <br />part of an issue of Sewer Improvement Bonds of the City, dated March 1, 1972 <br />and bearing interest at the rate of 5-1/87 per annum, payable semi-annually on <br />June 1 and December 1 of each year commencing December 1, 1972; and <br />WHEREAS, that lost bond was numbered 50, is of the denomination of <br />$5,000, matures on December 1, 1985, and had the following coupons attached: <br />Coupon No. Due Date Amount <br />25 June 1, 1984 $128.12 <br />26 December 1, 1984 128.13 <br />27 June 1, 1985 128.12 <br />28 December 1, 1985 128.13 <br />WHEREAS, the Council has determined that, under the circumstances <br />described in the affidavits, the acquisition of an indemnity bond to protect <br />the City against all loss or liability for or on account of the lost bond and <br />coupons would be a vain and superfluous act and not in the economic interest <br />of the City in that (i) because the bond and coupons were apparently lost <br />while in the custody of the City, the City would be the party responsible for <br />supplying the indemnity bond and, as such, would be the "principal" on the <br />indemnity bond; (ii) if an indemnity bond were obtained, the City, as the <br />principal on the indemnity bond, would nonetheless bear the ultimate risk of <br />loss from any payment in respect of the lost bond and coupons as the surety <br />company would obtain reimbursement from the City, as principal on the <br />indemnity bond, for any payments made by the surety company under the <br />provisions of the indemnity bond and (iii) the City would be required to pay <br />the cost of obtaining the indemnity bond which would provide no ultimate <br />protection from loss; and <br />WHEREAS, this Council has thus determined to proceed with the <br />issuance of a duplicate bond and coupons without obtaining an indemnity bond; <br />NOW, THEREFORE, BE IT ORDAINED by the Council of the City of North <br />Olmsted, Cuyahoga County, Ohio, that: <br />Section 1. Pursuant to the authority granted by Section 133.40 of <br />the Ohio Revised Code and the assurances received by this Council as cited <br />above and consistent with the foregoing recitals, there shall be issued a <br />duplicate bond, to be numbered 50, with duplicate coupon Nos. 25 through 28 <br />attached. The duplicate bond and coupons shall be issued upon the same terms <br />and conditions as the original bond No. 50 of an issue of Sewer Improvement <br />Bonds of the City issued pursuant to Ordinance No. 72-8 passed by this Council <br />, 4,...--