06/21/1954 Meeting Minutes (2) - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

D~nutes of the Public Hearing June 21, 195l~ The Council and the people of..the.Village of.Mayfield.met at the Village Hall in public hearing on proposed Ordinance No. 1~68.entitled: l~An Ordinance Adopting Rules and Regulations...Relative to the Platting of ].and and the Dedication of New Streets to be. Shown on such Plat,rr pursuant to notice properly made known to the residents.of .the Village of Mayfield fora period in excess of .thirty days....prior :to._such, hearing.. Mr. Edelman, Solicitor of the. Village of 'Mayfield, read proposed Ordinance No. l~68 to. those. assembled.. _ Mr. Sowin'stated that the residents_of the. Village of'Mayfield should have further opportuai.ty_ to study. this_ ordinance ..before..its passage by Council. . 114r. Zorn asked -of the provisions .for sewers and water lines inhere there are no outlets available. to._one.. who- wishes- to, allot: his-.property. Mr. Edelman stated that. proposed Ordinance No..468 specifically provides for such a situation by its express .terms, and that one who has no such outlets may be allagved to substitute suitable sewage.o_utlets and water supplies. Mr.~Zorn stated that since the_roads:.within a: subdivision were third grade roads, it. seemed inconsistent_to require an ..18 foot asphalt road when State Highways were only 20_foot:roads. Mr. Demore stated that a minimum of 18 feet is -necessary for. a-.safety factor.- . ' M Mr. Zorn asked the reason Ordinance. No..1~b8 was proposed as an emergency Ordinance. Mr. Edelman stated that if..passed.aa an~smergency ordinance it would be effective immediately . upon_ passage. Tf it was~•:not. passed. aa.:.an emergency ordinance it would be effective- _30. days .after .its., passage.....Therefore, due to the neeessities.of the situation,.Council.deemed it advisable to propose this ordinance,as an emergency_.:ordinance. .Mr. Zorn asked if presently existing subdivisions were to be bound .by this ordinance. - Mayor Hodgson .s.tated_.that:.there..:are. the.same_.requirements. under the old Ordinance which must:be-complied with before a street-ma3~ be dedicated to public use. The. purpose of this proposed Ordinance is to protect new residents. It is also a purpose of the proposed Ordinance to provide for. the completion of roads without additional expens.e...on..the part of .the other residents of the Village of Mayfield..-. Mr. Zorn stated that slag is not abundant..in_this..par°ticul.ar..locality, therefore bank gr-avel would.be a more reasonable required component of the roads which must: be constructed. Mayor Hodgson. stated..that__the. proposed_ Ordinance .contains a hardship clause. If a subdiv3.der.. cannot.. obtain _slag,. then it seems he could use bank gravel as a substitute component of the roads which must be constructed. 1.