Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Bullock spoke about Council's past practice of electing council leadership and expressed <br />interest in further exploring how other legislative bodies do this. He stated that his proposal <br />will give Council more time to deliberate as a body. He stated that prohibiting an appointed <br />councilmember from running for election could be attractive to members of the community <br />disinterested in campaigning. <br />President O'Leary replied that the proposal about electing leadership does not offer increased <br />flexibility but simply changes the date of the election. He also added that as it currently <br />stands, an appointed council-person is welcome to not campaign for election at the end of the <br />appointed term. He remarked that the Charter Review Commission just completed a <br />comprehensive review of the Charter, as did Council. He suggested referral to Committee of <br />the Whole. <br />Mr. Bullock added that his proposal on council vacancies will level the playing field and not <br />have a chilling effect. He argued that the Charter Commission's amendments to the Council <br />portion of the Charter were light and that there remain worthy amendments to be made that <br />were not considered by the Commission. <br />Mr. Litten spoke of his personal experience applying to fill a council vacancy in 2010. He <br />expressed his position that prohibiting an appointee from campaigning for election may <br />eliminate good candidates from coming forward. <br />Mr. Anderson objected to the suggestion that he and other councilmembers violated sunshine <br />laws in the past when electing council leadership. He stated that the proposals are solutions in <br />search of a problem. He described his experience being appointed. He questioned why <br />Council would want to limit the freedom of the electorate to choose a candidate during an <br />election. He expressed willingness to discuss these issues further. <br />Ms. George expressed willingness to discuss this in committee. <br />Mr. Bullock explained why he believes Rules & Ordinances is the most appropriate <br />committee and President O'Leary explained why he believes Committee of the Whole is <br />most appropriate. <br />On the motion: All members voted in favor. Motion adopted. <br />32. ORDINANCE 74 -18 - AN ORDINANCE to take effect immediately provided it <br />receives the affirmative vote of at least five members of Council, or otherwise to take <br />effect at the earliest period allowed by law, providing for the submission to the registered <br />voters of the City of Lakewood a proposed amendment to the Third Amended Charter of <br />the City of Lakewood. (pg.85) <br />Motion by President O'Leary, seconded by Mr. Anderson to refer to Committee of the <br />Whole. <br />