My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
MIN 06-15-20
Document-Host
>
City of Lakewood
>
Meeting Minutes
>
2020
>
MIN 06-15-20
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/15/2020 10:25:47 PM
Creation date
7/15/2020 10:25:20 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Office Of Council
Document Type
Minutes
Date
6/15/2020
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
25
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
As a person whose father and brother were victims of police violence and pretextual <br /> stops, I wanted to share my thoughts on what should be done to best address this <br /> issue from a perspective of someone from a brown community. <br /> First and foremost, it is important to seek out people from black and brown <br /> communities - residents - to be involved in shaping what these policies should look <br /> like. <br /> It is my opinion that the act of simply banning a choke hold does not address the <br /> systemic causes for implicit bias in our community. However, it does constitute a <br /> first step, which is essential if we are to get anywhere meaningful on this issue. <br /> My recommendations on policing policy changes to consider: <br /> Ban Pre-Textural Stops <br /> When developing the policy, consider that it is insufficient for it to define racial <br /> profiling as occurring only when race or ethnicity is the definitive, explicitly stated, <br /> or only factor underlying an officer's decision to stop, question, detain, or arrest <br /> someone. These definitions, though seemingly applicable on their face, provide <br /> plausible deniability to an officer as long as they can state any other nonaligned <br /> reason for making a stop, thus making it easy to argue that an officer did not make <br /> a stop based-on or only because of a person's race or ethnicity, even if the officer <br /> was, in fact, motivated by the person's race or ethnicity. <br /> It often happens that police stop folks from minority communities for a minor <br /> infraction and use it as justification of an additional search or investigation having <br /> nothing to do with the original reason for the stop. <br /> The process for stopping someone should be limited to only specific reasons stated <br /> directly to the person stopped, unless the officer has clear probable cause that a <br /> search of this person's belongings will give rise to evidence of a crime or reasonable <br /> suspicion that the person is armed and dangerous. <br /> Officers articulating the reason for a stop as soon as possible should be stated in <br /> the policy and required of all interactions with the public. <br /> Clarify the Unconstitutionality of Racial Bias in Policing <br /> The Equal Protection Clause of the Fourteenth Amendment of the Constitution <br /> prohibits police from stopping a pedestrian or motorist, regardless of infraction, if <br /> an officer would not have stopped someone of a different race or ethnicity for the <br /> same violation. In addition, the Fourth Amendment requires articulated reasonable <br /> suspicion that a person has committed, is about to commit, or is in the process of <br /> committing a crime or driving infraction. Unless an officer believes that a person <br /> may fit the description of a current wanted suspect that includes other identifying <br /> characteristics separate from race or ethnicity, officers are prohibited from using <br /> race or ethnicity as justification for reasonable suspicion. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.