My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
minhpd 03-01-21
Document-Host
>
City of Lakewood
>
Committee Minutes
>
2021
>
Housing
>
minhpd 03-01-21
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
4/13/2021 4:10:54 PM
Creation date
4/13/2021 4:10:50 PM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Office Of Council
Document Type
Housing
Date
3/1/2021
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
5
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
settled. He stated that this protection is important because the federal eviction moratorium is set <br /> to expire at the end of March and that we want to protect the most vulnerable. <br /> In response to a question by Chairman Shachner, Daniel McCarthy of NEOCH explained that the <br /> proposed ordinance does not conflict with Ohio Revised Code and that tenants have a right to <br /> raise any defense. <br /> Ms. Martin and Mr. McCarthy spoke about similar ordinances in Toledo, Dayton, and Yellow <br /> Springs. The pay to stay concept began in Dayton as the outcome of a task force. Toledo's <br /> ordinance does not sunset at the end of the pandemic. <br /> The committee discussed how Ordinance 12-2021 as written only applies during the COVID <br /> emergency and proposed adding a cushion to capture eviction proceedings that have been <br /> initiated during the state of emergency. <br /> Director Corrigan suggested the following amendment to Section 1: <br /> After the word"that"insert"any eviction action filed" ... <br /> A motion was made and seconded to adopt the amendment. <br /> The committee discussed the potential of making the policy permanent. Chairman Shachner <br /> stated that he is comfortable with the ordinance as-is and open to revisiting it at a later point after <br /> hearing more from landlords. <br /> Councilmember Bullock asked if the ordinance would interfere with a landlord's ability to evict <br /> a problem tenant acting in bad faith. <br /> Councilmember Shachner replied that the ordinance only applies to non-payment of rent and <br /> does not address situations where a tenant has broken a lease or caused damage. <br /> A roll call vote was taken as follows on the motion to amend: <br /> Yeas: Shachner, Kepple, Rader <br /> Nays: none <br /> Motion adopted. Ordinance 12-2021 amended. <br /> Councilmember Neff expressed support for the ordinance and for providing protections for <br /> tenants. She asked for the number of tenants currently displaced for non-payment of rent during <br /> the past year. She also suggested that landlords receive outreach on the proposal so their voices <br /> can be heard. She spoke about her experience as a magistrate mediating issues between landlords <br /> and tenants. She recalled that landlords were usually agreeable to dropping an eviction upon full <br /> payment if the issue was not complicated by other factors. She also asked questions about <br /> enforcement and if the ordinance allows a tenant to invoke this right multiple times. <br /> After the committee discussed final thoughts and sought clarification on certain sections of the <br /> ordinance, a motion was made and seconded to recommend adoption of Ordinance 12-2021 as <br /> substituted. A roll call vote was taken as follows on the motion to recommend adoption: <br /> 2 <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.