minpw 11-01-21 - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Discussion: Councilmember Bullock inquired as to what projects did not make the cut for grant application. Engineer Papke noted that the city will always be replacing water mains, so the goal was to find 3 streets that fit into the capital improvement projects category and try to keep them in an affordable project range. The application for these streets was based on age, as the water mains were installed in 1917. He added that they should score well, being 100 years old. Chairman Rader asked if the city typically has a good success rate with these grant applications. Mr. Papke stated that the city has received a grant, a loan, or both every year that he's been with the city, noting that the projects are being scored against all the other communities in Northeast Ohio. The city received a loan for its 2022 watermain projects. On the motion: All members voted in favor. Motion passed. Resolution 2021-41 was recommended for approval by the full Council. ORDINANCE 31-2021 -AN ORDINANCE to take effect immediately provided it receives the affirmative vote of at least two thirds of the members of Council to amend Section 903.10, Duty to repair and maintain sidewalks,tree lawns and driveway aprons of the Codified Ordinances of the City of Lakewood, to cap the cost of required repairs to sidewalks at $1,000 for certain qualified property owners that participate in the Sidewalk Program. (1st read and referred to PWS 9/7/21; 2nd reading 9/20/21) Councilmember Shachner outlined his proposed ordinance capping the cost of required sidewalk repairs. He stated that the legislation adds a section to 903.10 to put a cap on out of-pocket cost from a homeowner if he/she participates in the city's program. This would apply to owner occupied homes with no more than three units. Mr. Shachner analyzed costs of sidewalk repair from 2017-2020 and broke down the numbers and logic that he used to arrive at$1,000 being a reasonable number to cap cost. He added that having good sidewalks is a benefit for the public at-large and that he's in favor of how the city sidewalk program is being proactive. He complemented the program's approach that involves an estimate a year ahead of payment, which helps predictability for residents. Chairman Rader iterated his long-held position that sidewalks are public property and that the city should consider paying for them through the general fund rather than a public/private partnership. He asked how much the program costs per year. Director Ducu stated that the program started at$400,000 per year, rising to $650,000, then to $800,000 in 2018. He noted by today's standards, $100,000 covers about 4 blocks. On average, a home has 12-15 slabs in front of it and 20 if its lakefront property. Covid delayed the sidewalk program's operations, as the city did not want to send correction notices during the pandemic. The program's 2020 and 2021 years are still outstanding on payment, along with delinquents. He suggested the starting date for the legislation be January 2025. He also questioned what the $1,000 cap might look like in 5 years, considering incremental increases in concrete and labor. He outlined the 3-step inspection process, the labor it requires, and the deferred billing process the following year after installation which is designed to allow extra time for residents. Chairman Rader briefly recapped the 2 tracks proposed for the sidewalk program and asked about the 2025 start for the next cycle of the program. Director Ducu indicated that the city