Laserfiche WebLink
have collected. From what I understand, we actually did not collect the 1.5% of <br /> gross sales for the last couple of years but want to find out if we could get that <br /> information from the State Pharmacy Board. We moved to defer and will come <br /> back again in two weeks and will be ready for third reading. <br /> Motion by Councilmember Bullock, seconded by President O'Malley to receive and file that <br /> oral report. All members voted in favor. Motion passed. <br /> 6. ORDINANCE 05-2022 —AN ORDINANCE to take effect November 30, 2022 <br /> enacting requirements for structural engineer reports from property owners for the <br /> facade of any occupiable structure 30 years old and more than four stories in height, for <br /> any underground parking structure and any above ground parking structure. (Is'read <br /> and referred to HPD 217122, 2"d reading 2122122) (pg. 6) <br /> Motion by President O'Malley, seconded by Vice President Litten to substitute Ordinance 05- <br /> 2022. A roll call vote was conducted as follows: <br /> Yea: Baker, Bullock, Kepple, Litten, O'Malley, Rader, Shachner <br /> Nays: none <br /> Motion passed. Ord. 05-2022 substituted. <br /> Motion by President O'Malley, seconded by Vice President Litten to adopt Ord. 05-2022 as <br /> substituted. <br /> A roll call vote was conducted as follows: <br /> Yea: Baker, Bullock, Kepple, Litten, O'Malley, Rader, Shachner <br /> Nays: none <br /> Motion passed. Ord. 05-2022 adopted as substituted. <br /> 7. ORDINANCE 13-2022 - AN ORDINANCE to take effect immediately provided it <br /> receives the affirmative vote of at least two thirds of the members of Council repealing a <br /> portion of Lakewood Codified Ordinances Section 779.06 Fees, pertaining to medical <br /> marijuana dispensaries. (Is'read& referred to HPD 317122) (pg. 8) <br /> Motion by President O'Malley, seconded by Vice President Litten to defer Ord. 07-2022. <br /> Discussion: President O'Malley reflected on the process of approving medical marijuana <br /> dispensaries in 2017 and the decision to require a $25,000 permit fee. He remarked on the <br /> importance of this revenue to the city and asked the Law Department if there was any reason to <br /> believe that the permit fee could be in jeopardy. <br /> 5 <br />