Laserfiche WebLink
that Council deliberate on the proposed amendments and revisions. <br />President Kepple recommended taking action on the existing proposed version of Ordinance 39- <br />2023, with the possibility of substitution in subsequent discussions. <br />Planning Director Leininger reported that he and Law Director Vargo had the opportunity to <br />address the issues identified in the January 16th, 2024 Housing, Planning, and Development <br />Committee meeting. He highlighted that the focal point of the issues discussed by the Committee <br />was revising Section 4 of proposed Ordinance 39-2023, which deals with Section 1161.03(z) of <br />the Lakewood Codified Ordinances. Planning Director Leininger and Law Director Vargo <br />collaboratively formulated the following revision to Section 4 of proposed Ordinance 39-2023 to <br />read: <br /> <br />Section 4. ThatnewSection 1161.03(z) Body ArtEstablishment, of the Lakewood <br />Codified Ordinances is hereby enacted to read as follows: (z) Body Art Establishments. In <br />a C1 Office, C2 Retail or C3 General Business District a body art establishment, as defined <br />by the OhioAdministrative Code, may be a conditionally permitted use provided that: the <br />requirements of this Section are met. For the purposes of this Section, Body Art shall not <br />include Body Piercing. \[Body Piercing is regulated by Section 1161.03(AA).\] <br />Director Leininger clarified that the bracketed language serves the purpose of guiding individuals <br />seeking information on body piercing regulations to refer to Section 1161.03(AA) of the <br />Lakewood Codified Ordinances. He mentioned that the inclusion of this information within <br />brackets is presented as an option for Council to determine whether to retain or remove it. <br /> <br />Planning Director Leininger and Law Director Vargo suggested removing proposed Section <br />1161.03(z)-(10), “Body art establishments shall not include body piercing.” <br />Councilman Bullock explained the purpose behind discussing proposed Ordinance 39-2023. He <br />stated that the language pertaining to Section 1161.03(z)-(10) can be construed as confusing, <br />prompting the need for revision. Additionally, Councilman Bullock expressed a preference for <br />retaining the bracketed language while openly inviting the opinions of other Councilmembers. <br /> <br />President Kepple asked whether the administration and Council believe the revisions effectively <br />resolve the verbiage issues of Ordinance 39-2023 and whether these adjustments align appropriately <br />with the Ohio Administrative Code.Councilman Baker responded by emphasizing that the <br />significance of this revised legislation is providing clarity for individuals interested in performing <br />body piercings, making it evident that they are not obligated to adhere to the same zoning <br />requirements as body art establishments. While there are various methods to achieve this objective, <br />the revised verbiage serves as a clear and straightforward approach. <br /> <br />Motion by President Kepple, seconded by Vice President Shachner, to substitute Ordinance 39-2023 <br />as revised by Planning Director Leininger and Law Director Vargo. <br /> <br />On the motion: All in favor. Motion passed. Ordinance 39-2023 substituted. <br /> <br />3 <br /> <br /> <br />