Laserfiche WebLink
Thereupon Mr. Swanson stated that this would provide for Bonnieview and <br />also to the other areas of Mayfield Village now served by the present sewage <br />system in addition to new service wYiich would be possible due to the <br />proposed improvement. - - <br />Q. Audience: Will the present proposed improvement make any <br />provision.-for service east of Beach Hill Road? <br />A. Mr. Puzenski: Service east of Beach Hill Road is not in the- <br />prasent plans. It is possible that in the future <br />a trunk line can be extended down Wilson Mills Road. <br />Q. Mr. Endress:- Will the present proposed improvement be adequate if <br />at a future time service east of Beach Hill Road <br />is added? - <br />A. Mr. Puzenski: The present improvement will be adequate to allow <br />service east of Beach Hill Road in the future. <br />Q. Audiences Wi]1 the present proposed improvement make any <br />provision for the area of the Village of Mayfield <br />north of 1Yilson Mills Road? - <br />A. Mr. Puzenski: This improvement is not designed to care for the <br />northern care of the Village of Mayfield. <br />- Q. Audience: Is an assessment contemplated? <br />A. Mr. Puzenski: An assessment is contemplated.. Residents of the <br />Qilla~e of Mayfield w~.11 be assessed on the basis of <br />present and future benefit. Residents of the <br />Village of ~lta.yfield will be assessed for local, <br />present and future benefit even though they are <br />presently served by sewers. Other municipalities <br />_ - will also bear part of the burden on the basis of <br />their present and future benefit from the proposed <br />improvement. <br />Q. Audience: Why does not the present proposed-plan for alleviating <br />the sewage problem provide for all of the Village <br />of Mayfield? - <br />A. Mr. Puzenslci: The cost of such a measure would be out of proportion <br />to its utility. It-is not economically feasible to <br />include the area north of tiYilson l~.lls Road for it <br />would increast the cost of appro~dmately two million <br />( 2,000,00) dollars. <br />Q. Audience: What is to be the cost to the taxpayers of the Village <br />of Mayfield? <br />A. Mr. Puzenski: The exact cast has. not yet been calculated. The <br />local present and.f.uture benefit assessment will be <br />approximately 192 dollars per acre. Back acreage <br />' will of course be assessed at a lesser rate. And <br />when local mains are installed, additional special <br />assessments-would be levied at the rate of approxfzuately <br />15 dollars per front foot. The real cost of the local <br />present and future .benefit will be twice the amount <br />which is to be assessed against the property owners, <br />but the county has agreed to assume one half of the <br />local present and future benefit cost, <br />3. <br />