Laserfiche WebLink
It was moved by Mr. Fa]k, seconded by Mr. Hopkins9 that the px°eliminazy <br />plan of _the J& N re-subdivisa.on of block a£ sublots 3., 4a 5, 6& 7 be approved* <br />fto11 Ca11: Ayes - Nessrs Tay]°or,Strater,Brown,Falk and Hopkins. <br />. Nays - None• . .• <br />Motion caY°ried <br />Mr. Fa_l.k waent on to report that the Commission- ha.d before it a proposed <br />development - of the Van Cuux°°en px°operty, but e. as everytIcisig cerrEered around the <br />laclc of Sanif.az°y and Storm Sewers, and the fact that the City of Cl.eveland <br />wi71 not _ a11.ow water, no decisian or recommenclations were ma.de. Mrr. Falk <br />also reported that the matter of incaeas3ng lot sizes seemed to be taken <br />care of by the C3.ty of C].eve].and refusing water cozixiections wi.thout Sanitary <br />and Stom Sewers. <br />" The proposed Vari Curen Development and lot sizes we2°e then discussed ty <br />Counc519 with Xr. Edelman reading otax° Ordiiance concerndng th3.s and said that <br />in s ome cases septic tanks could be useda <br />Mr. Falk then brought up the subject of Concrete versus Black topped <br />roads and Magor Endress read aletter fx°om the Pease Enga.neering Company, <br />giving a compa.ri.son of prices on hid.s taken at the 1'ease EngineeeLng Oompany <br />for both types of pavemeritsv This showed $16.00 a Linear foot as against <br />021.00 for concrete. The letter went on to say that th:Ls was ari 3ncrease of <br />24% fbr concrete construction, birt the maintenance costs were xeduced arid <br />draina.ge clitches atad dx°iverwy cul,verts mre eliminatedo kfr. Edelman said that no legal action had been taken against tYie city <br />of C].eveland over the water question, but that it wau]..d be consideracl and <br />taken up at tkie next meeting of the Solici,tor's :Association. Mr. Edelman <br />said that no meetings had been held °during the sizrmmro <br />Mr. Edelman was asleed about an off-street parkixig oz°dinance •and said <br />tha.t he had the Orclinanees of Cleveland. I3eigkits ,ancl Parma, that they were <br />quite comp]i.cated9 that Clevel.and xeights lsft.their parking up to the Planning <br />Boarci and Parma had theix° detailed..for each type of businesss Mr. Ede]anan <br />then presented these ordi.nances to the P].a.sning and Zoni:ng Commi.ssion for <br />study and to see how much of the ordinance was reqv3xecl 3.n our Vi11age. <br />Reporting on an 3..nspecti.on of Thorna.pple Ih°ive made by Mr. Hopkins, <br />1"Ir. Weci].er and our engineer, Illr. Hopk3ns, reported that: Th,e Road. was too <br />neax to the pond and there was a possibility that water, action could Ttrash <br />away the bank and undernaane the pavement.. It was suggested that this be <br />pr.eperly enginneeraed. . ' <br />• The Inlet and outlet of a culvert, consisting of two 24 inch concrote <br />p3.pes 1.aid sicle by side, was inadequa,te to tal9e care of the drainage of 200 <br />acrese SoTm of t,he water 'curb boxes were below grade and abl boxes shoix].d <br />' be adjusted to grade level. Un lots No. 6758, 6765, 6775 and 6784 clrainage <br />ditches were encl.osed by various means, these drainage ditclies must be kept <br />open and it is suggesteci that the property owners maintain these d:itches by <br />' mowuig the lawia to the edge of the pavements. <br />3•