Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Edelman said that no inspection fee was mentioned and Council <br />M <br />r. Hopkins questioned <br />felt that $2.00 should be the aninimum inspection fee. <br />whether this ordinance should be under the Fire Chief or Mr. Wieland or both. <br />It tqas pointed out that this ord.inance concerned orL1.y non-residential waste <br />and that it did not apply to homes, as there was another ordinance covering <br />this phase of the matter. Mr. Zorn wonderzd if we should not add a maximum <br />and minimlun size to the rubbish containers, but Mr. Peterson said that safety <br />was the prime factor and, if a man -wished to spend all day burning rubbish <br />in a small saf e container, that was his business. Mr. Bordonaro asked if we <br />had compla ints about fi-res and Mayor Endress said that we had some, that he <br />could not say how mariyo Mro Bordonaro?said that las-t week he had some 50 <br />cardboard boxes to bu-rn and, if forced to-brealc-them up to pu t in small <br />con-tainers, it would take all dayo <br />Mr. Stratei said that he had every confidence in our business men' <br />that they were cooperating 100% wi.th us. This started a discussion about the <br />sma11 container explained to •the Safety Committee by Mr. Hopkins. The business <br />men did not feel that thi.s was appr-oved, but Mr. S-tra+,er said that -that was <br />the unders-tood fee]ing of the Committee. a <br />Mayor Endress again expl.ained about the wire container and said that <br />this was the minimum that the Building Inspector could approve; and mentioned <br />that we were new at this sort of thing, but could g9.ve it a trya that other <br />villages iaere doing it successfu.ll.y; that he telt that we should give it a <br />try and see iL it did not work outo <br />Mr. Dahlgren said that all of -F.he business men had been -here for <br />ten year•s9 that they kne-w the hazaids and tried to cope wi.th them, that <br />th.ey .knew what they had -to burn and it should be left up -to them. <br />Mr. Hopkins then said that the woz°d Ttincinerator°t seemed to be <br />the s-tumbling block in the ordinance and asked if -this could not be changed <br />to read "trash burner", and this would leave it open to a bet-ter interpret.ation <br />of what was a rubbish burner. Mr. Edelman said that a"burning dev3.ce'l would <br />be a better woi°d for t,his o <br />As th.is ardinance had had its first reacling, it was moved by Mr.Stra ter, <br />seconded by Mr. Vledler' that 'uhe rules of 1aw requiring an ordinance to be read <br />on three separate accasions be suspended. - <br />RoL ca7.l: Ayes - I"Zes s rs Taylor'Wedler' S tra te r, Bracan, Z orn & Hopkins. <br />Nays - None. <br />Motio-n carried <br />, RulES Suspended <br />It was inoved Uy lir. Strater, seconded by Mr. Hopldns, that Ordinance <br />?To. 635 "An Ordinance to Amend Ord3nance No. 349 entitled: TAn Ordinance <br />Governing the Disposal of Garbage, Rubbish, Nianure and OT,her Tgas'-,,e4, by adding <br />Section 9(d) Relating to Disposal of Non Residential TrTaste", be approved and <br />passed as amended and reade <br />RoTl Call: Ayes - Messrs Taylor,ZaTedler,Strater,Brawn,Zorn & Hopkinse <br />Nays - None. <br />Motion carried <br />Ordinance Passed 2.