Laserfiche WebLink
Mr. Shaw, reporting for the Finance Committee, said that they had met <br />and gone over the bills and f ound the Pay Ordinance to be in order. It was <br />then moved by Mro Shaw, seconded by Mr.-Mason, that Pay Ordinance No. 508-P be <br />approved and passed as readm <br />Roll, Gall;-Ayes •=•-NIessrs. 'Shaw, -•Bennett, =Wa1ker.,• ,Mason, S:loan & Belzer. <br />Nays - None. <br />Motion carried <br />Pay Ordinance Passed <br />Mr. Bardou then asked aUout the ditch that was being dug across his <br />property and that of some of his neighbors. Mr. Bardou said that the Neroni <br />developers were changing the water course; that the ditch now comes across SOM <br />just South of his home and about 100 feet from the present.water course. Mr. <br />Bardou said that`this-ditch had always-been a problem because it took care of <br />the septic tanks and some times became clogged and filled; that the new ditch <br />would leave his septic tank emptying into nothing; that he had given permission <br />for the cleaning and enlarging of the present ditch, but not f or any other water <br />course. Mayor Endress then asked our Engineer about this and he said that the <br />plans showed an easement across this property. Mayor Endress then asked the <br />Neroni Engine0r°about the matter and he could give no answer. It developed. <br />that through a misunderstanding upon the part of the Neroni Engineers an easement <br />was shown on the plans and the developers had gone ahead and completed a new <br />ditch based on this easement, which did not exist. The:Aieroni lawyer then <br />asked f or conditional approval of Council upon their plans based upon their <br />making peace with the owners of the property across which they had constructed <br />their ditch. Council said that they would have nothing to do with approval of <br />any plans until the developers had made their peace with the neighborss Mr. <br />Edelman said that consent had been given only f or cleaning and widening the <br />present ditch, Mr. Bardou told Council that over 10,000 feet of top soil had <br />been disrupted during these operations. Mr. Edelman then said that the Village <br />could not approve further progress until the property owners are satisfied; <br />that the developers had been trespassing on private property and Council could <br />not authorize the trespassing oii private property. <br />May,or Endress then reported that Mr. Wieland had a sign problem; that <br />the Sun Oil wished to erect a sign which overhung the sidewalk by about four <br />feeto There was a great deal of discussion in Council over this matter, with <br />Council objecting to any sign which hung over public property. Mr. Wieland <br />said that our ordinance does not say that we cannot have a sign over the <br />siclewalk; that we cannot do anything about it. Mr. Edelman said that Council <br />would have to waive this because it was over public property; that he would <br />check wittl the Regional Planning Commission.abou.t a new sign ordinance. Mr. <br />Shaw, seconded by Mr. Belzer, then introduced a Resolution entitled; " A <br />Resolution Authorizing the Sun Oil Company to Erect a Sign Extending Four Feet <br />Over the Sidewalk" which resolution was read to Councilo <br />It was moved ?by Nir. Sloan, seconded by Mr. Belzer, that the rules of <br />law requiri:ng a Resolution to be read on three separate occasions be suspended. <br />Ro11 Call: Ayes - Messrs Shaw, Walker, Sloan & Belzere <br />Nays - Mr. Bettnett and Mr. Mason <br />Motion Failed <br />Rules Not Suspended 5.