Laserfiche WebLink
It was moved by Mro Belzer, seconded by Mra Bennett, that this Resolution <br />be approved and passed as reada , <br />? - <br />Ro31.Ca11: Ayes - Messrs Zorn, Wedler, Bennett, Mason, Sloan & Belzer. <br />Nays - Nonea . <br />Motion carried <br />Resolution Passed <br />Mr, Sloan reported that there was nothing fram the Welf are Committee. <br />Mr. Zorn, reporting f or the Finance Conunitte2, said that they had found <br />the Pay Ordinarace to be correct. It was then moved by Mr. Zorn, seconded by <br />Mr. Wedler, that Pay Ordinance No. 465-P be approved and passed as read. <br />Roll Call: Ayes - Messrs Zorn, Wedier, Bennett, Sloan, Mason and Belzer. <br />Nays - None. <br />Motion carried <br />_ Pay Ordinanee Passed <br />. Mr. Ede].man then took up the Water.Main project in Worton Park and said <br />that the Assessing Board had met, that the advertisement had appeared in the <br />newspaper and asked.for a motion to approve the advertisement in the press. <br />Mr. S1oan, seconded by Mr. Wedler, then introduced Resolution Noo 538, <br />entitled; "A Resolution Approving the Advergisement of Notice of the Estimated <br />Assessment of the Cost of Improving Worton Parlc Drive, Woodlane Drive, North <br />Woodlaeie Drivey South Woodlane Drive, and Norman Lane Drive, by the construction <br />of water mains and appurtenancesg", which resolution was read to CounciZ. <br />It was moved by Mr. Masonn seconded by Mr. Belzer, that the rules of <br />law requiring a Resolution to be read on three separate occasions be suspended, <br />Roll Ca11: Ayes - Messrs 2orn, Wedler, Bennett, Mason, Sloan and Belzer. <br />Nays - Nonea <br />Motion carried <br />Rules Suspended <br />It was moved by Mre Belzer, seconded by Mre Zosn, that Resolution No. 538 <br />be approved and passed as read, <br />Roll Call: Ayes - Messrs Zorn, Wedler, Bennett, Mason, Sloan & Belzer. <br />Nays - None. <br />Motion carried <br />Resolution Passed <br />Mr. Edelman then spoke of the Weisberg trial and said that We.isberg . <br />had filed an appeal to the courts; that whoeves lost the case would have, to_,pay <br />f or .the cost of the. transcript of the trial, which would be around $700o OOm If-, ' <br />we win, this will be.taxed as a cost against Mr. Weisberg. Council had some _ <br />discussion on this matter. . _ • <br />It was then moved by Mr. Bennett, seconded by Mre Belzer, that the Village <br />of Mayf ield shall not furnish a transcript of the Weisberg trial. <br />5.