Laserfiche WebLink
<br />51 <br />. Regular Council Meeting .. <br />2/21/94 <br />Page Seventeen <br />side walks clean and got our roads edged off. He finds that particular type of <br />equipment might service us better than a skid-steer machine, which he is afraid of. <br />They are very jerky and similar to a tank. The Bombardier he wants to buy has the <br />same set-up on it. His main thought is that they need a little bit more time to think <br />about just exactly what we are going to buy. The manufacturers are coming out with <br />CD blowers now that are going to fit on the front of trucks. We have no place to put the <br />M snow. Since our code says the snow must stay on the ground on which it fell, so we <br />CO might as well blow it onto the front yard of the residents. That might be what he is <br />Q looking for. He thought right now, to get us by for the balance of this year and next <br />z year, this piece of equipment for $2,900 along with what we have should see us through. <br />? At that time, you may be spending a lot more money than $16-18-20,000 for a skid-steer <br />machine. <br />Mr. Fixler said he looks at this from a different prospective. This is a very unusual <br />winter that we have experienced. You can almost equate it to a 100-year storm. He : <br />does not want to get into a situate where they are blowing the snow onto the residents <br />property and doing damage to their homes. Was the piece of the equipment you had <br />discussed back in the fall more versatile that the piece of equipment you are using now; <br />the price was acceptable. He has a hard time spending $2,900 or $4,000 for the old piece <br />of equipment. He questioned the year. <br />Mr. Amendola said he has the actual picture of the machine that was published in the <br />paper; it is a 1977 not a 1967. <br />Mr. Fixler said they have just spent over $3,000 repairing their current snow <br />Bombardier. Mr. Fixler said he is sure Mr. Amendola will feel right now that that piece <br />of equipment is in good condition, but he would hate to get in a position where they are <br />going to spend another $3,000 or $4,000 repairing this one, and all of a sudden you put <br />the ttivo together and we could have purchased a$16,000 piece of equipment that you <br />were referring to last fall that seemed it would be very adequate for a typical winter <br />(perhaps not the one we just had), but the point is we spent all this money on these <br />snow Bombardiers and we will continue to spend money on them. He would, frankly, <br />just rather buy the piece of equipment for $16,000 less the trade-in, and go from there. <br />He has a problem spending this money. <br />Mrs. Cinco said this was discussed in Finance and it came out that possibly with this <br />purchase of $2,900 a couple of points: we didn't buy this piece equipment in the fall; <br />that is over and done with. It wasn't purchased. We are dealing with the equipment we <br />now have available to us or what we have in our Service Department. He knows Mr. <br />Busa brought up the point that by spending this $2,900 this could keep us going for this