My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/10/1994 Meeting Minutes
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
1994
>
04/10/1994 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 9:12:08 AM
Creation date
7/18/2018 8:49:24 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
4/10/1994
Year
1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
20
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
119 <br />Special Council Meeting <br />4/10/94 <br />Page Seventeen <br />Mr. Russo said we were led to believe that you were going to vote on legislation. I am <br />very confused. Mr. Fixler told us he was prepared to support the legislation. Are you <br />prepared to support the legislation, Mr. Fixler. <br />Mrs. Cinco said this meeting was for your convenience. We were going to have the <br />CD meeting at Caucus. <br />CC'7 <br />CY) Mr. Ehrhardt said he was told by Mark that a vote would be taken. <br />z Mrs. Cinco said I have the floor. This meeting was to have been this previous Monday. <br />C I called Mr. Russo to schedule it for tonight saying the public meeting would be tonight. <br />C There was not, from my mouth, a promise of legislation. <br />A resident (Nikki McPolin?) said isn't Mr. Fixler a member of this Council? Does he not <br />represent what you all said? Because, I think Mark is a pretty credible guy, so if he said <br />there would be legislation... <br />Mrs. Cinco requested a recess. <br />Council recessed at 9:45 p.m. <br />Council returned at approximately 9:55 P.M. <br />Mayor Rinker said I am making a request of Council. Throughout the discussion over <br />the past several weeks, and I have not varied from this, my concern has been safety. <br />Having believed that safety was an issue that had essentially been put to bed with this <br />proposal, the discussion about any alternative to me has always appeared <br />predominantly an economic issue. I do not elevate economics over safety. But, I <br />certainly have tried to look at this in talking of my recommendations to Council. I have <br />felt that we need to temper our decisions by being responsible in how we spend our <br />dollars. But the given in all of this discussion, in my mind, has been one of safety. It is <br />clear from tonight's meeting that whatever I have said, whatever I say about the issue <br />people are not satisfied. I recommend that Council take an addition week. I would <br />direct the Law Director, my Police Chief, Fire Department, Traffic Safety, and anyone <br />else who has knowledge that we can trust to review the entire package. The decision, <br />the bottom line, will be one of safety. It will not be one of convenience or <br />inconvenience. I have tried to make it clear that we have been mindful of that. I <br />commit to you that the safety matter is of utmost importance for that reason. Especially, <br />given the emotion tonight. No one will walk away from here feeling that we have <br />resolved anything if we don't do what we can to assure you that the safety issue is the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.