My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
04/18/1994 Meeting Minutes
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
1994
>
04/18/1994 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 9:12:09 AM
Creation date
7/18/2018 8:51:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
4/18/1994
Year
1994
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
19
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
126 <br />Regular Council Meeting <br />4/18/94 Page Four <br />Mayor Rinker said under these circumstances, yes. <br />Mr. Russo said that will allow him to significantly reduce the comments he was <br />going to make this evening, but he still has plenty he wants to say. Mr. Russo said he <br />wanted to begin by reviewing with everyone what has happened to this point, so we all <br />understand how we got here tonight and why we are here tonight. Mr. Russo said this <br />all started on March 22 when we, the residents, sent a letter to the 1Vlayor and asked him <br />to meet with us because we had heard that he was going to shut down the intersection <br />completely with the exception of northbound traffic on S.O.M. That shocked a lot of us <br />because it posed tremendous hardships, safety concerns, and a lot of problems to us and <br />we had had no opportunity to talk to the administration about that before the <br />administration made that decision. The Mayor was kind enough to meet with us. We <br />held our first meeting on March 26. At the March 26 meeting, everybody that was <br />involved with this project was there. At that point we presented two options. We <br />indicated the residents would be satisfied either by allowing north and south traffic on <br />S.O.M. or by allowing northbound traffic on S.O.M. and westbound traffic on Highland <br />so that we had two ways out. A second meeting occurred on March 28. At that point, <br />the Mayor indicated to us that of the two plans we presented, he and the administration <br />and his experts felt that the Highland Road plan was the safer of the two and the least <br />expensive of the two. At that point, we were told by Mr. Calabrese it was going to cost <br />$37,000 more to implement this. We immediately questioned that. <br />Mr. Ferrante asked Mr. Russo to address his comments to Council, not the <br />audience. He said we are the ones making the decision. <br />Mr. Russo said we were told by the Mayor that there would be a special meeting <br />of Council to consider this legislation. He picked the date, Apri110; and told us that <br />Council l would vote on the legislation at that meeting, but that he would not <br />recommend to Council that they pass the legislation. So 150 people came out to tell you <br />how we feel. We asked you to support us and vote for this legislation because it is <br />important to us. Three things happened at that meeting that shocked all of us: 1) The <br />Mayor reneged on his promise to bring the legislation up for a vote at that meeting. <br />There was no vote taken at that meeting. 2) Mr. Basile said he conducted a telephone <br />poll and four out of every five people in our ward told him they did not want this plan <br />changed at all. 3) All of a sudden there was a flip-flop on why the Mayor was opposed <br />to the project. He originally told us he was opposed to it because he did not want to <br />spend the money, but everybody that came to the Council meeting a week ago Sunday <br />heard him say it was no longer a money issue, it now was a safety issue. Tonight it is a <br />money issue, but they have found the money that we told them to find when we first <br />met with the members of Council.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.