My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
05/15/1995 Meeting Minutes
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
1995
>
05/15/1995 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 9:13:02 AM
Creation date
7/19/2018 10:30:53 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
5/15/1995
Year
1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
17
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Regular Council Meeting <br />5/15/95 <br />Page Six <br />Mrs. Kovacevic asked if we shouldn't have been given one ballpark figure so <br />funding could have been gone after for the whole project. <br />Mayor Rinker said it is a fair question, but all you get are very rough estimates. <br />There are rough estimates for those areas but they are exceptionally rough. There <br />has been no surveying; the grades have not been shot. That work isn't being done <br />now because engineering costs money. We will get reimbursed for the engineering <br />fees because the County has engaged the engineer. Highland Heights and Mayfield <br />Village agreed. The recommendation was that Steve Hovancsek's office do it. <br />Since he is the engineer in both communities, he is familiar with the lay of the land <br />et cetera. There is so much complicated work just to do the North County Trunk <br />pipeline that the rest just has to wait. <br />Discussion was held. <br />Mrs. Scasny said when Council President Fixler talked to their group, it was a <br />turning point. There was an amenable attitude and it makes all the difference in the <br />world where we should've been in the beginning. Because we could sit there and <br />make sense of all of our energies, we got to what is now most of what we've <br />proposed, we see in the minutes of this meeting. One thing needs to be clarified-- <br />because there are phases to this, we are not going to say that all of what we are doing <br />now to go along and move ahead to be where we are is just going to slide into the <br />next phase. We have not decided that when we get past this initial phase of <br />reducing assessments the best we can, we're not just going to slip into the next phase <br />and this association will be quiet or be disbanded. We will expect the same <br />commitments from this Council, this President and this Mayor that we are getting <br />on this phase of the project. If we don't, we will have to do what we did to begin <br />with and find out what has to be done to be heard. <br />Mayor Rinker said he would expect more from the committee in the next phases <br />and looks forward to their energies to find monies that are out there. <br />Mr. Scasny asked how they can keep these commitments as Council members <br />change. <br />Mayor Rinker said anything that is committed, that does not change. Apart from <br />that, it definitely will take commitments from residents. It takes neighborhoods <br />getting together. That involvement alone is an insurance policy. He knows what <br />she is asking--can Council make a commitment--are there certain things that will <br />bind over time--like a contract. In some things, yes; in other things no.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.