My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/17/1995 Meeting Minutes
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
1995
>
07/17/1995 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 9:13:06 AM
Creation date
7/19/2018 10:34:18 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
7/17/1995
Year
1995
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
26
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Regular Council Meeting <br />7/20/95 <br />Page 19 <br />Clothing allowance for Service Department - requested by Michael Schaeffer - Council <br />President Fixler asked Council's feelings about the request. <br />Mrs. Cinco said she said it sounds to her like they still want to keep the contract, use <br />less uniforms but give them something to handle their boots and T-shirts. She thinks <br />that is a good compromise. <br />Roll Call: AYES: All <br />NAYS: None <br />Motion Carried <br />Proposal Accepted <br />A motion to approve an expenditure in the amount of $2,754 to Ameritech for 911 <br />Positron maintenance <br />Mr. Busa, seconded by Mr. Basile, made a motion to approve an expenditure in the <br />amount of $2,754 to Ameritech for 911 Positron maintenance. <br />Roll Call: AYES: All <br />NAYS: None <br />Motion Carried <br />Expenditure Authorized <br />Home Federal Sign Request (789 S.O.M. Center Road) <br />Council President Fixler asked if everyone had seen the picture. He said he noticed the <br />sign above their doorway that is white with blue letters. He asked if it is a temporary <br />sign--and did they get a permit for it. <br />Chuck Zingale, from Brilliant Sign Company said it is a permanent sign and they got a <br />permit for it. <br />Council President Fixler asked how they got a permit for that sign. <br />Mr. Samac said that went before the Architectural Review Board. It was approved by <br />them. It needed no action by Council or the Planning Commission because there was <br />no variance required. <br />Council President Fixler said this is part of the inconsistency problem. The <br />Architectural Review Board allowed them to put up the sign that is the exact color <br />combination that Planning and Zoning is objecting to. <br />Mr. Samac said the provisions of the code that apply are different.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.