Laserfiche WebLink
?7 ou, <br />be granted because of the.law of Ohio and of the United States. He stated <br />they contend the parking requirement of one parking space for 75 square feet <br />for medical and dental off ices and this restriction against medical offices <br />is arbitrary, capricious, and does not bear any substantial rela.tionship to <br />public health, welfare, safety, morals and is unconsti.tutional. In an attempt <br />to resolve this matter without any litigation they suggest_, and would accept <br />the restriction of one parking space for Each 75 square feet of inedical and <br />dental off ices to be.so occupied in Building C.' Building C has 7,200 square <br />feet and the proposed medical use in that building is 3,100 square feet. The <br />other part of the building, 4,100 square feet, is presently occupied by the <br />Courtney Engineering Firm. All of the buildings in the Beta complex are 92°; <br />leased. The projected parking space used, based on an actual.count shows <br />that presently onYy one car is parked for each 300 square feet of floor area <br />leased. The original building complex was reduced from 79,000 square feet <br />(projected) to a 66,000 square foot complex. Even under the variance granted <br />there is a tremendous surplus in parking spaces. Counts have been made of <br />actual.parking spaces used by an employee of Mr. Paris, who will testify if <br />necessary. Sgt. Jay and Commissioner Amendola have also taken counts. Taking <br />into consideration full occupancy, there is still a surplus of 240 parking <br />spaces. Witnesses will testify what.other communities require for medical/ <br />dental buildings. Mr. Simon and'Mr. Gould will testify, as planning experts <br />who have studied other codes as developers of inedical bu.ildings. He asked <br />Council to give the ma.tter their full consideration. <br />Mr. Feneli asked that Mr. Paris' employee testify that he personally surveyed <br />the parking lot at the times and dates indicated in his parking space counts. <br />Mr. Bartunek said he had two exhibits he wanted Mr. Lauer (Mr. Paris' employee) <br />to testify to; Exhibits la through li - plot plans of the existing property, <br />and Exhibit #2 - a survey repeating what he found. <br />The Court Recorder administered-the Oath of Mr. Patrick Lauer, 2717 Hampshire, <br />Cleveland Heights, an employee of Paris Development. <br />Mr. Bartunek asked Mr. Lauer to identify Exhibits la through li. <br />Mr. Lauer stated Exhibits la through li were prints copied fzom his originals, <br />and were accurate. He explained the'prints and how the survey was taken, <br />reading his list of survey dates and times and the summary of available parking <br />spaces. <br />Mr. Feneli asked Mre Lauer if, to his knowledge, any tenant at any of the <br />buildings in the Beta Office Complex was notified that he would be conducting <br />a parking survey on any of the days or times indicated. <br />Mr. Lauer said he knew for sure, no. <br />Mr. Aaron Paris, 6699 Gates Mills Elvd.,•an employee of Paris Development, <br />was given the Oath by the Court Recorder.