Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Council Meeting <br />14-21 4/18/88 - Page 12 <br />Jeanne Leppla asked if they thought the wording on the agreement could be <br />made a little more specific so that they're protected and don't have to go <br />to every meeting to see what they're doing. <br />Mayor Carmen said that you have elected people who are supposed to protect <br />your interests. If you don't think they're protecting your interest, your <br />choice is to get rid of them at the next election. He said at some point <br />you have to give some credit to the people who are supposed to be running <br />your government that we will try to do those things that the residents want <br />in relation to the things that need to be done to govern the town. He said <br />he thinks that they have done a good job in getting the residents almost <br />everything they want in this agreement. <br />Mre -Rife said they are asking throught the petitions that Council would <br />honor the Worton-Pinetree Park Homeowner's Association to shelve this until <br />the whole thing is committed to. <br />Mayor 'Carmen explained that there is a recommendation from Planning and <br />Zoning before Council 'to approve the plan. It's now up to Council to vote <br />on whether they wish to accept or reject the recommendation of.Planning and <br />Zoningm ; <br />Mr. Rinker said he would like to make this contingent upon the relocation of <br />the signs. He said said that he would want to see the computer listing on <br />the f ourth housem <br />Mayor Carmen said if a motion would be made, it would be contingent upon <br />compliance with the sign ordinance. <br />A brief discussion was held. <br />Mayor Carmen clarified ?that Council is voting to accept the recommendation <br />of Planning and Zoning as ise <br />Mre Petschauer said he believes we are all in agreement that one of the <br />major elements in this agreement is the obligation that Progessive has to <br />list the four homes in question. He asked if the four contracts signed by <br />Progressive fill that elemento <br />One or two members of the audience said no, <br />Mr. Rinker moved that Council vote on the acceptance subject to the <br />conditions: <br />1) That it meet the specifications f or the sign ordinance <br />2) That the f ourth house, although listed per agreement <br />is not on the computer, that that also be accomplished. <br />Mr. Petschauer said he agrees with that contingent upon the listing of all <br />four homes in the computer. <br />Mr. Feneli said the final contingency is the same one that carried 'along <br />with the Planning and Zoning recommendation, they had a contingency attached <br />which dealt with a deed restriction on the properties over which the buffer <br />will encroach. <br />Mr. Rinker, seconded by Mr. Flynn, made a motion ?to accept the plan <br />with the above-mentioned contingencies. <br />Roll Call: AYES: All <br />NAYS: None Motion Carried <br />Plan Accepted With Contingencies <br /> <br />I <br />?