My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/16/2000 Meeting Minutes
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
2000
>
10/16/2000 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 9:26:43 AM
Creation date
7/18/2018 5:21:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
10/16/2000
Year
2000
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
21
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Regular Council Meeting <br />10-16-00 <br />Page 14 <br />road by someone who didn't have the Village's interest in mind, what recourse would we have--what <br />are our options. <br />Mr. Diemert said the Village would have no option except imminent domain and then the price value <br />would have to be fair market value at the time of trial. We are already 5 years later--this price was <br />negotiated in 1995 so it probably has a higher fair market value now. <br />Nfr. Brett said the price now is what has already been negotiated contemporaneously at an arms <br />length transaction. <br />Mr. Diemert said we didn't establish a price. <br />Mr. Brett said no; we did not. <br />Mr. Ilacqua asked if we chose to exercise our right to purchase the property and then wanted to <br />negotiate a deal with the DeMichele family to acquire a lease on the land etc. could we then secure <br />rights as to how that land would ever be disposed of--how can we continue to protect ourselves. <br />Mr. Diemert said if we exercised our option and bought it, we could then lease it to them rather than <br />sell it. <br />Mr.-Brett asked what about a nature conservancy. <br />Mr. Diemert said you can always set up a nature conservancy over any land but normally you <br />wouldn't do that and then lease it out for residential use. You can attach any contingencies you <br />want. You can enter into a contract with them and transfer the property with the condition that they <br />can't ever sell it and retain a deed that has a reversionary clause in it which makes it go back to the <br />Village whenever they do so. Then that has lesser value than fee simple. <br />Mr. Ilacqua asked Mr. Diemert if our options from a legal standpoint are limited unless we buy the <br />property and renegotiate. <br />Mr. Diemert said you can always take land by imminent domain but then you are going to pay the <br />improved value and the inflated value as the years go by. On the other hand, you were using your <br />own money during this time period and investing it and maybe it is making money during that time <br />period. <br />Mr. Brett asked for Mr. Diemert to tell him if he is correct, that one option is to buy the property, <br />establish a nature conservancy or deed restriction on it, sell it for the then market price to whomever <br />you want knowing that you decided to give up control of it that you are at least controlling the nature <br />of that land. <br />L~ <br />1 <br />Mr. Diemert said he is not sure what Mr. Brett means by that but if you are letting someone use it for <br />single-family residential then it is not going to be for a nature conservancy. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.