Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Council Meeting <br />8-18-08 <br />Page 13 <br />Ms. Calta replied that September 2°a will be a Caucus meeting. There will be no voting on any <br />legislation. <br />Ms. Leone asked if they are able to talk at that. Mr. Marrie said they are. <br />Ms. Leone asked if the highlighted areas on the map are where they are going in. Ms. Calta <br />replied that what has been highlighted are leases that have been acquired. The cross-hatching is <br />the Stonecreek area which has been approved. Ms. Leone pointed to the area in question on the <br />map which is the Village property. Ms. Calta said that is correct. Ms. Leone asked if we have <br />any input at all. Ms. Calta replied that that is what we have been referring to throughout this <br />evening's meeting. We are still conducting due diligence and will have another report at the next <br />meeting. <br />Ms. Leone said we talked about beautification at this meeting and here we are doing this. She <br />really hopes Council takes into consideration that we live here. A lot of us do not want it. <br />Mayor Rinker replied that the thrust of this is we know a lot of people don't want it. The <br />problem is how do we manage it. We certainly want to try to do it in a way that will be as <br />advantageous as possible. Landscaping is one of the issues and overall operations. These are <br />some things we feel we can negotiate into the lease. At least with a lease we have an opportunity <br />to enter into some kind of contractual relationship instead of simply saying we don't like it and <br />then it gets forced and then we just get bitter about something we don't control at all. Whether <br />they get drilled or not is not Council's decision. <br />Ms. Leone is talking about if you continue that drilling process. Mayor Rinker stated he does not <br />understand what is meant by continuing that drilling process. Ms. Calta replied that the lease <br />that is proposed is a non-drilling lease. Mayor Rinker added we are not drilling on Village <br />property. Ms. Leone asked what exactly that parcel will be used for. Ms. Calta said it would be <br />included in the acreage necessary for them to drill the one drill site identified on the map. There <br />is only one drilling site. There is only one well head. <br />Ms. Leone asked what exactly this parcel will be utilized for. Ms. Calta replied that there won't <br />be anything located physically on this property. At the risk of confounding it, Mayor Rinker <br />stated to think of a checkerboard. You have so many squares on a checkerboard. It takes a <br />checkerboard to drill one well. Our property would represent a number of those squares, but for <br />one well. The location is shown on the map as an "x". They drill down and that's it. Another <br />well can't be drilled any closer than 600 feet. There has to be a different checkerboard of <br />properties assembled to support that well. One of the questions is if we don't participate to allow <br />that board to be compiled for this well, what other properties would get aggregated in order to <br />drill that well? <br />Ms. Leone said they are drawing in from that property. Mayor Rinker clarified that all they are <br />doing is it is a mathematical number. They need to collect acres on the surface to justify being <br />able to drill. They have to purchase agreements from property owners as to whether or not their <br />drilling rights can be aggregated because the state has created this equation. The state has set the