Laserfiche WebLink
Caucus/Regular Council Mtg. <br />7-14-03 <br />Page 15 <br /> <br />Roll Call: AYES: All <br />NAYS: None <br />Motion Carried <br />Advertisement Authorized <br /> <br /> <br />^ A motion to authorize an expenditure in the amount of $~h (THIS AMOUNT <br />WAS CHANGED TO $h & changed again to & changed to $12,300 for <br />the final figure) to Marshall Equipment Co. for an Exmark 60" riding mower; <br />accepting the trade-in to Marshall Equipment of our 1994 Button rider mower for <br />$2,700 <br />Mrs. Mills, seconded by Mrs. Cinco, made a motion to authorize an expenditure in the amount of <br />e "_ __ $12,300 to Marshall Equipment Co. for an Exmark 60" riding mower; accepting the <br />trade-in to Marshall Equipment of our 1994 Button rider mower for $2,700. <br />Council President Buckholtz asked if there was any discussion. <br />Mr. Riter questioned if that is in the amount of $11,500 or is it not to exceed $11,500. <br />Mrs. Cinco said not to exceed; this was also approved by Safety & Service. <br />Mayor Rinker said the amount should be $11,700. <br />Council President Buckholtz read the motion again: to authorize an expenditure in the amount of <br />$11,700 to Marshall Equipment Co. for an Exmark 60" riding mower; accepting the trade-in to <br />Marshall Equipment of our 1994 Button rider mower for $2,700. Mrs. Mills and Mrs. Cinco <br />moved again. <br />Council President Buckholtz asked if there were any comments. <br />Dr. Parker said just to make it clear, the trade in will be less; in other words, we will get back the <br />$2,700 which is apparently the way we purchased or transacted this. I didn't want it to be unclear <br />that that $11,700 included the $2,700 trade in. <br />Mr. Brett said Mr. Metzung is not here.... <br />Mr. Riter asked, is it possible that this item could wait until the next meeting? <br />Mr. Brett said I don't know whether it is going to be a net $9,570 or if it's gross. <br />Mayor Rinker said I will not shed any light on the numbers, however, Councilman Riter, the <br />need is there. It's not a question of whether; it's a question of how much. The number, we'll <br />ultimately sort out. But as far as the trade-in and voting this through, I would ask that Council <br />vote it and approve it. My apologies if we've got some glitches in the details. <br />