My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/20/2003 Meeting Minutes
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
2003
>
10/20/2003 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 9:29:29 AM
Creation date
7/24/2018 6:27:23 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
10/20/2003
Year
2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
24
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ROUGHDRAFT - NOT REVIEWED OR APPROVED BY COUNCIL <br />10-20-03 <br />Regular Council Meeting <br />Page 13 <br />contributions. Again, so there are a lot of opportunities that have presented themselves by looking at <br />a trail in this particular corridor. So I think those are different considerations but all being said, take <br />it a step at a time and I think it's a great opportunity. What this will demonstrate is how this could be <br />effective and I think it will make it much more interesting for people to consider in the other parts of <br />town. <br />Mr. Marrie said since the last meeting we had, I dug up a couple comments-I am sure Tom doesn't <br />remember writing the letter in 1999, but for sidewalks east of S.O.M.-concerning your comments <br />at the last meeting, Bill and I haven't gotten any further on that than what I have here in my hand <br />which was an estimate of what it would take and what it would. entail. That, primarily was on the <br />north side of Wilson Mills east of S.O.M. And it was just some comments by Tom and Steve, <br />without going into full blown engineering, because it would have to have that anyways just like we <br />are doing it on this one, but of having a walk on the north side and maybe extending the south <br />sidewalk on Wilson Mills. I haven't gone any further than that but that's why I am for this trail walk <br />now. Because I think this is just the beginning but I do agree with earlier comments that there are <br />other parts of the city that need something. I think I made a comment last time-I don't think we <br />need them up on S.O.M. north of-south of Wilson Mills - but I think there are other parts of the <br />Village. This may not be the way to go but it maybe an eye opener to maybe put the.trail somewhere <br />else. So I am going to take it on myself on this one to look into it and I'm going to continue to do it. <br />Mrs. Mills said I was just looking at Section One and it explains exactly why we should be for this <br />particular ordinance when it says it is to identify the grant funding sources and to prepare initial <br />grant applications. So I think if we are going to get any monies to help us, we have to be ready and <br />able to do all this. <br />Council President Buckholtz said I have a suggestion, in the interest of tying this all together, in the <br />4th paragraph, Joe, if you could take a look at where it says, "Whereas........" in there or in one of <br />the paragraphs, would it be a problem to add language something like and identifying potential <br />access points for future trail and pedestrian pathway tie-ins? <br />Mr. Diemert said I think that might change their quote. Now they'd be going outside the scope of <br />what was originally identified. <br />Council President Buckholtz asked, do we know that? I mean, you're just putting underneath the <br />terminology aterminus-or like a starting point and an ending point? <br />Mr. Diemert said well their quote has aterminus-starting and ending points. "A two-mile trail <br />corridor...." <br />Several side comments were made in agreement with Mr. Diemert. <br />Council President Buckholtz said leave it to additional legislation to take it beyond? <br />Mr. Diemert said I think we should talk to them and see if we could add on to this what it would <br />cost. I bet it wouldn't be a whole lot. <br />
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.