Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of Council <br />Monday, September 19, 2011 <br />Page 4 <br />PLANNING DEVELOPMENT - Ted Esborn <br />Mr. Esborn would like to make a couple points about the Resolution that is on the agenda this <br />evening for the State Issue I Infrastructure Bond Program. This is the program through which in <br />2007 we funded the Beta and Raleigh realignment, the work on Seneca and the Thornapple <br />Pump Station. We have had projects go through this program before. It's a very short window <br />that the Planning Commission gives for this. We have a inonth from when they roll it out to <br />when applications are due. <br />This is the first time we have applied since 2007. We are moving to get everything together. It <br />mentions on the agenda that this is Phase I. We list Eastgate, Meadowood, Ravine, Thornapple, <br />Robley and a portion of Wilson Mills. Phase I is projected just to be Eastgate and Meadowood. <br />As of this moment, we are intending just to apply for funding to install sanitary sewers on those <br />two streets. I also want to stress that this Resolution does not involve any expenditure. If we are <br />awarded the grant, there will be a Grant Agreement that is put together in the suinmer of 2012. <br />This really is just a formality of the application. There will be another agreement if we are <br />awarded the grant. <br />To supplement what Ted was saying, Mayor Rinker added, we have tried every time we have <br />done this to make sure that the amount each resident would pay is comparable across the <br />community. The variable is always the scope of the work and the extent of the work that has to <br />be performed. So the scope is not just the number of houses that would be hooked up but the <br />nature of the terrain. In our community, a lot of areas where there's bedrock which adds costs, <br />we have found every time we have gone out on this particular neighborhood that that has been a <br />problem. For the number of units that we can hook up, the way it's scored, State Issue I is often <br />very challenging because it looks to who ultimately benefits from it. On the other hand, we are <br />under ongoing regulatory mandates to improve water quality. So we are kind of caught between <br />two different regulatory factors. At the end of the day, every time we have done this, and this is <br />going to be no exception, we try to balance those competing factors so that individual residents <br />end up at about the same point and the combination of grants, contribution from the Village, <br />assessments, loan components, that this all equal out. Again, the real challenge is, in the <br />marketplace it becomes harder to find cost efficiencies in order to make it equal for residents <br />across the board. Ron has already looked at how we can break out a per unit cost looking at <br />inflationary factors since really the mid `90's and beyond that, Tom, John and Doug, collectively <br />are trying to make sure that we spec this in a way that will be as advantageous as we can in the <br />scoring system that they provide to DOPWIC. <br />ADMIIVISTRATION - Diane Wolgamuth <br />There was no report. <br />STANDING COMMITTEE REPORTS: <br />Activities Committee - Mrs. Mills reported that the Committee met on September 7th. At that <br />time, we reviewed the 4th of July Celebration and the Summer Concerts. The consensus is that <br />we should have mostly big band sounds at these concerts. Up and coming events are the Santa