My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/06/2010 Meeting Minutes
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
2010
>
10/06/2010 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 9:30:21 AM
Creation date
7/24/2018 8:10:48 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
10/6/2010
Year
2010
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
41
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes of a Public Hearing <br />October 6, 2010 <br />Page 34 <br />all of our authority to close our eyes and walk away and not be informed on what's going <br />on in our government? Doesn't representative government - <br />Mayor Rinker: I thought you were going to ask one question. <br />Q: These are points I'd like Dr. Keller to address and he can do so in whatever way he <br />chooses. Doesn't representative government depend on the fundamental honesty and <br />integrity of those we elect to office? Doesn't this all lend credence to Abraham Lincoln's <br />point that the ballot is stronger than the bullet? <br />Dr. Keller: You've got several questions. I would go back to an earlier question. Your strongest <br />protection of rights is having citizens who can hold office where they can deliberate. And <br />the only way representatives can hold office is through election. When they can't <br />deliberate, when issues go in special elections on an issue, I don't think the rights are as <br />protected as they are in a process where citizens are empowered to deliberate about them. <br />And whether you agree or disagree with the outcome is a whole different thing. Most of <br />the time you can vote down that issue or you can vote that person out of office. That's <br />your protection of rights. What's happening and what I see a lot is people want to <br />intervene in one or two issues. And I understand they're important. I'm not saying <br />they're not important. But it elevates tYiose issues above all the rest and it really doesn't <br />protect rights because it doesn't fit with the overall government. So that's why we as a <br />Charter Review Commission are concerned about how do we structure government so we <br />get deliberation and that we get citizens involved in the whole process of government and <br />that to me is why Charter Review Commissions are so important because they truly are <br />citizen-driven and citizens give up an unmense amount of time for almost no pay or any <br />pay at all.to deal with the issues in the community and then come back to the community <br />and you have the right to vote it up or down. That really protects your rights. Rather than <br />having sporadic elections in which the information may or may not get out or may or may <br />not be digested in the amount time between the decision and the time the election is held. <br />That's the content of my comments. <br />Mr. Diemert: If I could just supplement the answer from the Professor. I just came back from a seminar in our Nation's Capitol and at the U.S. Capitol on Saturday it was very .- <br />interesting to know, there is no referendum on any action in the United States. The <br />Constitution of the United States under which we exist today has no referendum to the. <br />voters of the United States of America. And if you remember as you were all talking <br />about Jefferson and Hamilton, the Great Compromise, although some wanted to have the <br />voters have a direct influence which is why we have the House of Representatives, the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.