02/19/2000 Meeting Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

Regular Council Meeting 2-19-01 Page 7 Roll Call: AYES: All NAYS: None Motion Carried Expenditure Authorized • A motion to authorize an expenditure in the amount of $86,726_44 to the Bureau of Worlanan's Compensation Mrs. Mills, seconded by Ntrs. Cinco, made a motion to authorize an expenditure in the amount of $86,726.44 to the Bureau of Workman's Compensation. Council President Marquardt asked if there were any comments. There were no cornments. Roll Call: AYES: All NAYS: None IVlotion Canied Expenditure Authorized • S.O.M. Widening: Council President Marquardt said the next 4 issues are options on S.O.M. Center Road Widening. Option #4 was the one that was recommended by the S.O.M. Center Road Widening Committee. Any one of these if it passes takes the other 3 off. Mr. Busa, seconded by Mrs. Mills; made a motion to authorize Option #4: Oution #4: Tv modify the typical cross section (pull in bike path, taper towards roadway curb at both sides of Aintree North entranceway.) The existing fence arid entrance wa11 would be outside of any new right-of-way purcha.ses and not be removed as part of the project. All costs would be O.D.O.T. eligible. Temporary work easements along the bike path which would pravide patentially the necessary room for construction of the improvements. The temporary work easements would provide for the removal and reconstruction of the existing fences. All costs would be O.D.O.T. eligible if the fences were replaced in kind. The Village would incur any expense to modify or upgrade the fencing scheme. Note: This option, #4, was recommended by the S.O.M. Center Road Widening Committee at its January 30, 2001 meeting. Council President Marquardt asked if there were any comments for discussion and asked Mr. Ilacqua to give brief explanation on that. Mr. Ilacqua said we looked at the design of this intersection at length and basically every option available. We feel this addresses the needs of that intersection in the most appropriate way to not only protect the Village and be cost effective but to address the needs of the residents as well. We feel that by employing work easements and fitting in the bike path between the existing brick fagade and then going back and working with the home owners to modify or perhaps upgrade the fencing scheme there--we would not be oniy upgrading the look of the entranceway, we would be building a