Laserfiche WebLink
Regular Council Meeting ? <br />11-19-01 <br />Page 2 <br />There were no comments. <br />Mayor Rinker said we provided you with a little bit of a packet. There are a couple of issues he <br />wants to touch on. The first one, which has prompted all of you to come back to us, is one that <br />we are likely never to resolve to anyone's satisfaction. I think it may become an academic issue. <br />That is the question of the representation made that it could be catastrophic [if it were hit.] <br />Every representation made to us, both before and after that date, has been to the contrary. We <br />started from a position that if that is going to be that kind of a problem, something needs to be <br />done. East Ohio Gas has been adamant that the regulator can't be placed underground. It was <br />about a year ago when this issue was last addressed by Council. Since that time, the first I had <br />heard that this was still posing an issue, it was brought up about 2-3 weeks ago. Then, we tried <br />to pick up the ball where it was and see what could be done. The practical solution would be <br />that East Ohio Gas, in looking at the area, has two locations--one where they could combine 4 <br />regulator structures (if they could find a suitable place); and that would likely be across the <br />street. Whether we will have the opportunity to do so, we do not know. We know that is still an <br />option that East Ohio Gas is looking at. Where things stopped here last year, there was some <br />tentative discussion as to whether or not the church site would be a location. We still think that a <br />viable location for East Ohio Gas would be somewhere on the church site. That is something we <br />need to revisit as far as where it could go; what it would require--an easement; what limitations <br />the easement would pose. We probably have to look at the pros and cons of that site, the pros <br />and cons of the other site. Ideally, East Ohio Gas will expend all the funds and do all it needs to <br />do to relocate, but it needs a final landing place. The last word I heard was that Mr. Metzung <br />had talked with Ty McBee of East Ohio Gas; all he could say was that he was aware that these <br />options still are available. As far as a timetable for construction plans for any of those details, <br />he did not have the information as of yet. I think our best course of action is to work with East <br />Ohio Gas to explore those 2 possible locations and see if it will work out. Then, it will be a <br />collective decision between Council and the Administration as to what the down side may be, <br />what the positives are in relocating it. That would be most desirable course for us because the <br />alternative is going to be problematic as far as finding a new site that would require our <br />expenditure of funds. I am hoping we don't get into that kind of impasse. That is really what we <br />have to look at--what is going to take to relocate. We will keep you updated. I am sure that is <br />something that Dr. Parker can report back on. <br />Mr. Sullivan asked if they would agree to respond within the 60 days. <br />Mayor Rinker said yes. Dr. Parker is the one who had contacted us and let us know that this had <br />returned to the table so we can definitely keep in communication. <br />Dr. Parker said there has been some conflicting information about the safety issue. If that <br />structure were to get hit, he has heard that there is an automatic shut-off system built into it. <br />Mr. Metzung said that is correct. I have asked East Ohio Gas to provide us with a letter to <br />describe the safety features of the gas regulators. Your understanding is correct. If it should get <br />hit, it's like a pressure release valve, that when that kind of pressure goes, something <br />automatically shuts off. In their letter, I asked them to describe the mechanics of how that