Laserfiche WebLink
Special Council Meeting <br />2-24-03 <br />Page 5 <br />? <br />? <br />Council President Buckholtz said Friday; okay. It has to have purchase agreement attached to it. <br />Council doesn't need to vote on purchasing the property just yet. To purchase, there is a grace <br />period? <br />Mayor Rinker said I would call it that because it gives Council a chance to think about it. <br />Council President Buckholtz asked, when do we get the word back on Issue One, roughly? Are we <br />talking 6 months; 3 months? <br />Mr. Brett said I'm going to guess 3 to 4 months. <br />Council President Buckholtz said okay. When would we have to vote or act on the purchase of the <br />property. In other words, I think what Mr. Marquardt might be going for here is, I understand the <br />use of the property in the interest of-do we have the opporiunity to-if we don't win the grant, if <br />we don't win the money, the Issue One money, is there potential to back out of the purchase <br />agreement? Or, would it cost us money? Or? <br />Mayor Rinker said well the quick answer I give you, the quick answer is yeah but I don't <br />recommend it. On the contrary I am advocating that we commit to it because the other argument <br />that we are making with O.D.O.T. is we are buying this land; we're creating a park. <br />? Council President Buckholtz asked is the O.D.O.T. money separate money from what we are talking <br />about here? <br />Mayor Rinker said yeah, it is. But we are talking about the underpass. There are 2 things here. <br />There's the property and the underpass. The underpass we've had in our plans for at least 2, if not 3 <br />years. <br />Mr. Marquardt asked in whose plans? <br />Mayor Rinker said we Mayfield Village. It's been in the engineering plans, it's been part of the <br />discussion but O.D.O.T. ultimately has to go through, in their amenable fashion, through their <br />bureaucracy. And starting about 3-4 months ago, the feedback we got through Kevin Kehres, whose <br />been handling that part of our connection with O.D.O.T., with U.R.S., who deals with straight <br />engineering issues is letting Doug know, well, you know O.D.O.T. hasn't committed; I don't know; <br />they don't know that there's a park there and I'm going what does it take. We've got drawings that <br />we've had in place, engineer drawings; we have another, a schematic, that shows that in terms of the <br />administration's position since the Fall of 1999 we have been promoting the bilateral trail system. <br />We've shown where different locations like Wiley Park, at the Pool and in the southern portion have <br />been trying to promote the idea that we can enhance green space area, aka parkland area. Why <br />doesn't O.D.O.T. get it; I don't know why O.D.O.T. doesn't get it. We have consistently <br />represented what we wanted to do there. We've tried just the other evening I got the drawings <br />together to show everybody; our residents, Council, P&Z, O.D.O.T., NOACA, anybody out there <br />` who cares to look at what we are doing, we mean what we say. We are looking to create this <br />greenway corridor, not just widen the road. Therefore if all you want to know is if there is going to