My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
02/24/2003 Meeting Minutes
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
2003
>
02/24/2003 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 9:31:43 AM
Creation date
7/24/2018 10:02:41 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
2/24/2003
Year
2003
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
30
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Special Council Meeting <br />2-24-03 <br />Page 5 <br />? <br />? <br />Council President Buckholtz said Friday; okay. It has to have purchase agreement attached to it. <br />Council doesn't need to vote on purchasing the property just yet. To purchase, there is a grace <br />period? <br />Mayor Rinker said I would call it that because it gives Council a chance to think about it. <br />Council President Buckholtz asked, when do we get the word back on Issue One, roughly? Are we <br />talking 6 months; 3 months? <br />Mr. Brett said I'm going to guess 3 to 4 months. <br />Council President Buckholtz said okay. When would we have to vote or act on the purchase of the <br />property. In other words, I think what Mr. Marquardt might be going for here is, I understand the <br />use of the property in the interest of-do we have the opporiunity to-if we don't win the grant, if <br />we don't win the money, the Issue One money, is there potential to back out of the purchase <br />agreement? Or, would it cost us money? Or? <br />Mayor Rinker said well the quick answer I give you, the quick answer is yeah but I don't <br />recommend it. On the contrary I am advocating that we commit to it because the other argument <br />that we are making with O.D.O.T. is we are buying this land; we're creating a park. <br />? Council President Buckholtz asked is the O.D.O.T. money separate money from what we are talking <br />about here? <br />Mayor Rinker said yeah, it is. But we are talking about the underpass. There are 2 things here. <br />There's the property and the underpass. The underpass we've had in our plans for at least 2, if not 3 <br />years. <br />Mr. Marquardt asked in whose plans? <br />Mayor Rinker said we Mayfield Village. It's been in the engineering plans, it's been part of the <br />discussion but O.D.O.T. ultimately has to go through, in their amenable fashion, through their <br />bureaucracy. And starting about 3-4 months ago, the feedback we got through Kevin Kehres, whose <br />been handling that part of our connection with O.D.O.T., with U.R.S., who deals with straight <br />engineering issues is letting Doug know, well, you know O.D.O.T. hasn't committed; I don't know; <br />they don't know that there's a park there and I'm going what does it take. We've got drawings that <br />we've had in place, engineer drawings; we have another, a schematic, that shows that in terms of the <br />administration's position since the Fall of 1999 we have been promoting the bilateral trail system. <br />We've shown where different locations like Wiley Park, at the Pool and in the southern portion have <br />been trying to promote the idea that we can enhance green space area, aka parkland area. Why <br />doesn't O.D.O.T. get it; I don't know why O.D.O.T. doesn't get it. We have consistently <br />represented what we wanted to do there. We've tried just the other evening I got the drawings <br />together to show everybody; our residents, Council, P&Z, O.D.O.T., NOACA, anybody out there <br />` who cares to look at what we are doing, we mean what we say. We are looking to create this <br />greenway corridor, not just widen the road. Therefore if all you want to know is if there is going to
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.