My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/04/2018 Meeting Minutes
DOcument-Host
>
Mayfield Village
>
Meeting Minutes
>
2018
>
06/04/2018 Meeting Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
3/22/2019 11:00:15 AM
Creation date
3/22/2019 6:31:09 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
Legislation-Meeting Minutes
Document Type
Meeting Minutes
Date
6/4/2018
Year
2018
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
18
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Minutes of the Special Meeting of Couilcil Monday, June 4, .2018 <br />Page 3 : . <br />It was mentioned. residents. in 2006 did vote in this type, of ordinance for this type of . <br />housing. The only one you had was SOM Coui-t. There just hasn't beeil a reasonable <br />amount of land that could be put together that would support that kind of neighborhood <br />where we could, do that here. Tlle buildings would not be as. tall as it would in large <br />homes on large lots. We think that the impact to the community in terms of population will be less in that <br />development than the large homes with families in them. Currently I believe the Village <br />lias about 3,400 residents. If I figure 2-4 people iii those units the way we have it planned <br />out, at the max you could have 100-104 people. It still leaves you 1,500 residents short <br />of being a city. That's been a big concern for a lot of people. It's really a minimal <br />impact on that. <br />To follow up a little bit more, when the Village did its survey in 2017, .56% of the people <br />that responded are concerned about senior housing in tlie Village. They want to stay <br />here. This we feel is providing that. I could very easily just put a subdivision in there <br />and not go through all of this but we think it's a better fit. <br /> <br /> <br />Council President Saponaro thanked Chris Skoda. I don't know if Council.or anyone at <br />the table has any questions for you. <br />Mayor Bodnar stated, thank you; Chris. I have a couple of questions. Did I liear you <br />correctly at the beginning of your. presentation, did you say that the plan for the planried ' <br />residential development calls for mostly ranches? <br />Mr. Skoda, replied; we had some prototype houses set up that show a second floor. <br />Because 'some of the people we talked to said; well if my grandchildren come over, <br />maybe I want some place for them to stay as opposed to trying to put all_ of the bedrooms <br />on the first. floor. Almost everything we have come up with has at least two bedrooms on <br />the first, but tliere was an option for a second floor where they could- put. one or two more <br />bedrooms if they warited. But nothing we propose is etched in stone. We are more than <br />happy to work with Council and get residents' ideas. We just tliought we would propose <br />something that could happen. <br />Mayor Bodnar asked, you indicated that you were estiinating the number of people that <br />would be residing in the planned residential development. Does that include the two <br />parcels you have already bought or does tliat. also include the third propei-ty under <br />coritract? <br />Mr. Skoda replied, that would be all of thein. I figured four people per unit. <br />Mayor Bodnar stated, okay. Tliank you. . <br />Mr. Williams asked, what is the price range for each individual unit?
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.