Laserfiche WebLink
Minutes of the Regular Meeting of Council <br />Monday; June 18, 2018 <br />Page 8 . <br />Planning and Zoning. I am sure you guys received my letter: I hope so. If you allow me to read that <br />in so that I can liave it in the Minutes toiught. It's kind of lengthy. <br />Council President Saponaro stated, we can certainly attach it. You. don't need to read it in. You did <br />provide_it to us so we do acknowledge it. Mr. McDowell stated, so I think a lot of my points were there: If you look at the intent. section, I <br />think you guys raiseci poirits that we should look at for should this go in to the Village and the major <br />points were income taaies, your- property- taxes. I think the Village has enough money. We. are <br />fiscally sound. I don't know if that should be as weighted as high as it was: But also the intent <br />section of the planned residential community. - There were a couple of things I mentioned in my letter. <br />tliat the process is kuid of haphazard. Idon't,think there's a well-defined process for this. <br />Council President Saponaro stated, but that's not something that we as Council - <br />Mr.1VIcDowell stated, but you do have a.process though. You have been talkuig about how you look <br />at the process. Correct? Council President Saponaro replied, what we do is--this is part of the problem, this is part of the issue here. We had a Charter Review Commiss'ion that decided that they were going to amend this section. <br />When they ainended it, they didn't say, hey; you know what? Anybody that wants to change zoning, <br />you don't go before Council, you get your petitions and you go to the electorate. And everyorie in the <br />Village voted for, this process. They said, you go to Council and the Mayor or you go to the <br />electorate. One or the other. So it makes it harder for us because the way we've always in the past <br />looked at this and it's never been an issue is that, hey, all we are doing is,. there is really no reason <br />that anybody is raising in teims of essential services. That's really what we've looked at. Oh, you <br />know, there's. a: risk here because. That's one tlung. Obviously, there's going to be times where <br />wlien you go through the process that certainly. all the resideizts come in and they talk to the P&Z and <br />the different Comtnissions and the Boards and give their input on it. But that does not automatically <br />say it is going to go througli by us putting it on the ballot. It's a slippery slope either way for us. <br />But I read your entire memo. I think that a lot of what we are. talking about is premature in sonie ' <br />ways. However, it's not for you guys because you feel strongly about it. We hear you. Thaf's what <br />tlus open portion is a11 about. I appreciate where you are coming from.. We are not making the <br />decision to put it on the ballot or not with all of this,. looking at everything, we tlunk it's going to fit <br />in the character aild nature and all of that kind of stuff. All we are doing is saying it goes on the <br />ballot or not and that's really what is the hard part here. That's all I am trying to say: I think for the <br />rest of you, for the iest of the situation, whether. it's this or anytlung else, that's why we have <br />processes in place. So if it doesri't meet requirements, it doesn't go duougll. There's a lot of places <br />where it could be stopped in that process. Over the years; we have all been here, everything doesn't <br />just get rubber-stamped and get pushed tluough. There are a lot of tlungs that never make it because . <br />you kilow what, they just don't comply and they don't ineet the requirements. I just wanted to give <br />tliat clarification for you. <br />Mr. McDowell stated; sure. I think when you tall< about essential services; I think that maintaininb <br />the safety of the sun•ounding houses would be a part of that, would you agree? Flood control?