Laserfiche WebLink
. <br />h .? <br />PLANNING COMMISSION MARCH 24, 1987 PAGE 4 „ <br />and piers on the front elevation, seconded by J. Thomas, and unanimously <br />approved. Mr. Bierman explained that if they wanted any material other <br />than brick, they, would have to appear before the Board of Building Code <br />appeals for a variance. Members discussed the motion pointing out that <br />other exterior materials are approved and a variance would not be required. <br />PZr. Morgan stated that since the other buidings in that plaza have brick <br />on the rear it would be in keeping to have brick on the rear of this <br />building, especially since it will be more visible from Dover Center Road. <br />Roll call on motion: Bierman and Morgan, yes. Thomas, Betts, Gorris, <br />Traczyk, and Burns, no. Motion failed to pass. It was pointed out that <br />the Architectural Board had not discussed the rear wall in their minutes. <br />Mr. Thomas moved that before the Planning Commission approve the Cheradon <br />Plaza III, construction of a retail shopping center, we foiward the plans <br />back to the Architectural Board of Review for their comments on the rear <br />of the building. Motion was discussed and since the Architectural Board <br />only meets once a month this would delay the project for another month. <br />Mr. Thomas withdrew his motion. J. Burns moved to approve the proposal <br />to construct a retail shopping center on the southeast corner.of Dover <br />Center Road and Brookpark Extension with these changes: the driveway on <br />the south side of the building be 21 feet rather than 20 feet; front <br />elevation of the building be constructed as recommended by the Architec- <br />tural Board of Review with glass from the ceiling to 1 brick on the sill; <br />just 1 sign location for Plaza III sign as shown on the print now (sign <br />describes the plaza); and that the material th at is to be used on the <br />rear wall be acceptable by the Building Department, or that if it is a <br />non-complying material that proper variances be obtained from the Board <br />of Building Code Appeals, seconded by M. Betts. Roll call on motion: <br />Bums, Betts, Bierman, Gorris, Thomas, and Traczyk, yes. Mr. Morgan, no. <br />Motion carried. <br />IV. NEW DEVELOPMENTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: <br />1) Gareau Assembly Plat, <br />the proposal is to assemble permanent parcels 237-5-5, 237-5-6, and <br />237-5-16 into one parcel of land for the proposed office complex located <br />on the southwesterly corner of David Drive and Lorain Road intersection. <br />The parcel is zoned General Retail, Business, and conforms to mi.nimum <br />frontage and area requirements. <br />City Engineer Schaller advised that these three parcels will be assembled <br />to make a single conforming parcel. Building plans were_approved pre- <br />viously. B. Gorris moved to approve the assembling.of permanent parcel <br />numbers 237-5-5, 237-5-6, and'237-5-16 in one single parceT located orn <br />the southwest corner of David Drive and Lorain Road, seconded by R. <br />Bierman. Roll call on motion. Gorris, Bierman, Betts, Morgan, Thomas, <br />and Traczyk, yes. Mr. Burns abstained. Motion.carried. <br />2) . Pebblebrook Subdivision <br />The proposal is to:realign the rear prope'rty lines of sublo.ts 9, 22, and <br />23, of the Pebblebrook Subdivision. Parcel "A", which is to be removed <br />from sublot 9, has an area of 0.0542 acres and parcel "B" which will be <br />removed from sublots 22 and 23 has an area of 0.1463 acres. All parcels <br />will meet the minimum.area requirements of the code.