10/07/1987 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

.lw>.i...i..i.. .s....?........?.?.?.a??...s.....??.?....i?ti?i._???iu?.?u ?....a.a? .u- ....iu.?u.?.i.?.i.a.a .?.i.t?.?J.a?.a?.+u.wu.iu.?..i.?...?...?.?. Y,r • ? 1 BOARD OF ZONING APP$ALS OCATOBER 7, 1987 PAGE 4 I from Biddulph, Inc. objecting to the request. Mr. Yesberger, owner of North Olmsted Golf Gourse, stated that letter was from both golf courses. Mr. Brennan explained that the above requested variances are.sacrewhat different from the request of Pheasants Walk since Sunrise developed the land and the houses are being built by different builders. At the time they develoned the lots they did not know what type of homes were to be built, however, the lots conform to the codes. Since some of the builders may need variances, they are re- questing these variances in order to keep individual building from coming in with each request. Councilman Tallon stated that during the discussion on the platting of the lan.d it was made clear that the lots were must conform to ttie type of housing to be built. He cannot understand why they are now requesting variances on 80% of the lots. Mr. Grace stated that he had inquired about developing some of these lots and he was told to submit building plans that would conform to the size of the lots. Mr. Brennan stated that the cost of'developing the property was such that larger homes would have to be built in order for the b uilders to make a profit.. Chairman Remmel believes..that the Board should control any variances individually. Mr. Graces stated there is an ethical question as to whether the City should grant variance when the subdivision plat was presented and approved with the expectation that the . houses would conform. Mr: Yesberger stated that many of these variances would bring the houses even closer to the fairways, pointing out that he and Mr. Schepp had worked with the developer in order resolve problems with the homes abutting the golf courses. C. Remmel moved to grant the 10 foot front set b ack variance for sublots 1-6, 10-21, and 30-59 and the 10 foot.rear set back variance for sublots 2-3, 5-6, 10-22, and 33-59, as requested by Pebblebrook Subdivision, seconded bv B. Grace. Roll call on motion: Remmel, Grace, Bugala, and Gommersall, no. Motion failed to pass. Variances denied. Mr. Gareau stated that the first requirement-for granting any variance should be hardship as it concerns the size, shape or topography of the land that is not shared by other properties in the immediate area and that economics are not a factor. Mr. Brennan was advised that the builders could come back on an individua•1 basis. 8. Robert E. Cornelius, 5340.Evergreen Dr. Request tor variance (1123.12). Request variance for location of tool shed (permit issued for conforming location and shed is installed): Violation of Ord. 87-93, 'Section 1135.02(d)-1. Chairman Remmel called all interested.parties before the Board. The oath was administered to Mr. Cornelius and a neighbor,.Mrs: Brown. Board had no pro- blem with the location variance. R. Gouiersall moved- to grant the request of Mr. Robert Cornelius, 5340 Evergreen Drive for a variance for the location of the tool shed, seconded by R. Bugala, and unanimously approved. Variance granted. 9. Richard and Deborah Nelsen, 7009 Warrington Request for variance (1123.12)a Request location variance for tool shed. Violation of Ord. 87-93, Section 1135.02(d)1. Note: existing shed to be removed. Chairman Remmel called all interested parties before the Board. The oath was administered to Mr. and Mrs. Nelson who.explained that the old shed which is located next to the house will be removed after the new shed is completed. They were advised that there might be deed restrictions.about having sheds in their subdivision. R..Bugala moved to grant the location variance for the tool shed with the stipulation that within 60 days of the completion of the