06/03/1987 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

1 BOARD OF ZONING APPF.ALS JUNE 3, 1987 PAGE 2 that at the point where they are placing the shed it would be the rear property line. Board has no objection to the location, however the_y are concerned about the height. Miss Leopold explained that this style of shed cannot be lowered, and she prefers this style since it has a skylight and is compatible with the style of the house. She maintains that tlie other types of shed look like barns. C: Remmel moved to grant the 1 foot 10 inch height variance and a 40 square foot area variance for a shed9 seconded by R.. Bugala. Roll ca11 on motion: Remmel, Bugala, Gomersall, and Helon, No. Motion failed to pass. Variance denied: Mr. Remmel stated that the Board would grant a location variance. Miss Leopold questioned why variance was not granted and stated that there were many shed that high in her neighborhood. Miss Leopold left the meeting without the lo.cation variance. 3. Daniel A. Healyt 30942 Windy Ho11ow Request for variance (1133.13). Request 2 foot height variance for fence on rear property line. yiolation of Ord, 62-33, Section 1151e04-H: Ghaixcnan Remmel called all interested parties before the Board. The oath was administered to Mx. Healy who explained that his property was adjacent to the city baseball diamond and that when he built this house, he was told that the diamond was to be relocated to North Olmsted Park, but due to lack of funds this will not be done now. Mr. Remmel agreed his had a problem and questioned if he would agree to a 6 foot fence. Mr. Healy explained that a 6 foot fence would not give him the privacy he needs since the grade where the fence is to be installed is about 18 inches lower than hi,s house. He pointed out that he is only asking for a fence on the rear property line. The Board believes that a 6 feet would be acceptab le and are eoncerned that the other residents will also be asking for variances. C. Remmel mpved to grant a 2 foot variance for the fence, seconded by J. Helon. After some discussion, Mr. Hea1y agreed to change the request to a 1 foot variance: Mr. Remmel with drew his motion. R. Bugala moved to $zant a.1 foot variance 'for a fence on the rear property line for D. Healy, 30942 WYndy Hollow Dr, seconded by R. Gomersall, and unanimously approved. Variance granted.. 4. Robert Czuchran, 5574 Burns Rd. Request for variance (1133,13). Request 2 foot rear property line varfance and 3 foot 6 inch side property line variance to construct replacement garage. Vi:olation of Ord. 62-33, Section 1151.04-C. Chairman Remmel called all interested parties before the Board. The oath . was administered to Mr. Czuchran who explained that he started to build the garage on the existing slab, and did not realize he needed a variance. Mr. Remmel pointed out that this is the second time that he started con- struction without a permit. Mr. Czuchran stated that he got a permit to demolish the old garage, but lumber was delivered and work started earlier than he had planned. Board agreed that the garage would be an improvement. C. Remmel moved to grant the variance requested, 2 foot rear property line variance and 3 foot 6 inch side property line variance, to construct.a replacement garage at 5574 Burns Road for Mr. Czuchran, seconded by J. Helon, and unanimously approved, Variance granted.