12/13/1988 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

PLANNING COPIMISSION DECEMBER 13, 1988 PAGE 3 settlement that was entered into by the city and the developer in so far as the plan shows the building, the parking spaces, the landscaping, and those things that are a part of the judgement entry and are not subject to variation. He had been advised by the Law Director that anything not shown on this plan would be subject_to the Zoning Code and the review of the Planning Commission. Mr. Dubelko stated that there were two split zoned parcels involved. Mr. Giesser explained that the existing driveway onto Columbia Road was to be relocated to the south. City Engineer Cesen stated that the retention plan shows the flow going to the east and the Engineering Department prefers that it drain into the storm sewer in Columbia Road. Mr. Traffis, the abutting neighbor, is concerned about parking which is not adequate now; drainage, since water overflows from the parking lot onto the rear of his property and over the sidewalk; traffic from the new drive which is only 20 feet from his property, point- ing out that the.traffic in this area is. extremely heavy. now;.and also .. believed that the planned 6 foot fence will not shield his property from a light which is now on the rear of Danny Boys: (previously thexe was a house on the.property which blocked this light). Mr. Dubelko stated that the fence, parking, and driveway.were part of the judgement,.but the lighting had to conform to code. Pir. Morgan advised.that the,drainage would be reviewed by the Engineering Department who would take his comments into consideration. Mr. Hipp, also a resident of, Columbia_Road,.reiterated complaints about drainage as well. as flooding problems.in his.,basement, Mr. Cesen advised,that they will review this situation....J. Thomas moved to send the proposal to construct an addition for retail. and.storage space to the existing building in Romp Plaza to the Engineering Department for review of drainage along Columbia Road, as well as the south end of the new development; to the Building,Department.for review of the lighting plan and for possibly either shielding the_light or asking the.developer to propose a new light for the back of.Danny Boys to prevent any spillage of the light upon the adjacent residential area; and.to the Architectural. Board of Review for review. of:the si.te plan for.whatever,they can do.with it within the constraints of the court order; and to the Safety Department also for review of the driveway and traffic f1ow,.seconded by R.:..Bierman,. and unanimously approv.ed. 4) Sohio Sexvice Station, 29131.Lorain Road . Proposal to construct storage building. Mr. Sichau, architect representing the Standard Oil Company, explained the proposal to construct a small.unheated storage addition of concrete block to the rear of the existing station. There is an existing rubbish enclosure which is to be removed. Mr. Thomas questioned where the new ,dumpster will be located and.if it would be enclosed. Mr. Sichau does not know if..it were to be enclosed, and ques.tioned what material should be used. Mr..Thoma.s pointed out that there were.two other dumpsters on the site and believes all the trash.recepticles should be enclosed. Since the proposal will have to go. on to the BZD Committee which is meeting after the next Planning Commission meeting, it was decided that the proposal should.be continued until the next meeting with the-request that the drawings show exactly where the enclosure would be located and the type of materials to be used. Mr. Sichau agreed to withdraw this proposal and return on December 27th.