07/25/1989 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r 'k 1-1 PLANNING COMMISSION JULY 27, 1989 PAGE 4 development. The Commission questioned the 25 foot strip adjacent to the Westbury property. Mr. Mize explained that there is another 25 foot strip on the Westbury property and an easement agreement so that a portion of this 50 foot strip will be used as a driveway onto Great Northern Boulevard. B. Gorris moved to approve the Great Northern Properties Company Lot Split proposal to subdivide sublot number 2 into two (2) sublots, the new lot fronting on the east side of Great Northern Boulevard between Country Club Boulevard and Brookpark Road, the new lot will approximate 198.62 feet across and will be approximately 262 feet deep; and according to this draw- ing there is approximately a 25 foot calculated strip now on the northwestern- most portion of this remaining sublot 2 which is to be coupled with a 25 foot easement on the property to the north (Westbury Apartments) which will allow up to a 50 foot roadway on the property, seconded by T. Morgan, and unani- mously approyed. 2) Timothy Quinn Resubdivision. The proposal is to resubdivide permanent parcels nos. 234-22-15 and 234-22-16, located on Hastings Drive, into three (3) sublots. Zoning is "B" Reisdence, Single, and all proposed sublots conform to the Zoning Code. C. Dunlap represented Mr. Ouinn who is out of town. He expalined that he and Mr. Quinn jointly constructed the sewers that service this (and other) property. Assistant Law Director Dubelko advised that there is no problem with having another renresentative for a proposal as long as no questions are raised that he cannot answer., In.response the the Commission's questions, Mr. DunZap advised that the property is vacant, but he does not beleive that all of this property is considered a part of the Bretton Ridge Subdivision. Mr. Cesen advised that the lots will meet all code requirements. Mr. Gorris questioned if the type of house to be built could be constructed on sublot 3. Mr. Curtis does not believe that there would,be a problem since the lot has a 70 foot frontage and is 200 feet deep. B. Gorris moved to approve the Tim Quinn re- subdivision, proposal to resubdivide ge mianent parcels numbers 234-22-15 and 234-22-16, located on Hastings Drive, into three (3) sublots. The Zoning is "B" Residence, Single, and all proposed sublots conform to the Zoning Code, seconded by J. Thomas, and unan.imously approved. 3) Nelson and Pleve Lot Split The proposal is to split off the rear portion of permanent parcel no. 237-34-16 and join it to parcel no 237-34-33, which abuts. Location is the east side of Warrington Drive. Zoning is "A" Residerice, Single. Proposed sublot B does not, nor did not formerly, conform to the Zoning Co:de for required frontage; sublot C conforms to the code. Chairman Thomas read the request and explained that there was a small strip of property in the rear of one lot which would be added to the adjacent lot. The fact that the frontage of sublot B does not conform is not affected by this assembly. Mr. Cesen advised that the square footage of the lots would conform. rir..Pleva and Mr. Nelson were both present. It was clairifed that a portion of land would be removed from sublot "B" and attached to sublot "A". Mr. Dubelko agreed with the Commission that no variance would be required. J. Thomas moved to approve the Nelson and ?leva Lot Split, described as a split off of the rear portion of permanent parcel 237-34-16 and jointing it to 237-34-33 which abuts it. It is our understanding that parcel "B" did not conform to "A" residence zoning because of the frontage, but it does conform to the square footage required by that zoning before and af'ter the lot split, seconded by R. Bowen, and unanimously approved. 1 -