My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/24/1989 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1989
>
1989 Planning Commission
>
10/24/1989 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:31:28 PM
Creation date
1/29/2019 4:33:11 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1989
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
10/24/1989
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
7
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />PLANNING COMMISSION <br />2) <br />OCTOBER 24, 1989 <br />PAGE 2 <br />5 foot strip (shown as a jog on the plan) in order to have sufficient <br />parking. It was clarified that they had recieved the October 17th letter <br />from the forester stating that other trees were not shown in the right <br />location an.d would-have to be removed. Consulting City Eng,ineer Cesen <br />advised that he had an assembly plat for this property, but it does <br />not show the rear section which is to be split off. He questioned if <br />the assembly should be withdrawn. Mr. Bruscino would like the property <br />to be assembled and a lot split would be presented later. T. Morgan <br />moved to approve the Bruscino Medical and Professional Building, revised <br />plans, consistent with the recommendations of the Architectural Board of <br />Review, the forester, Assistant Fire Chief Osterhouse comments relative <br />to the fire hydrant, and with the intention of landbanking 15 spaces out <br />of 84 leaving a total of 69 at the present time, seconded by G. Knight, <br />and unanimously approved. Mr. Cesen presented the assembly plat to <br />combine parcel numbers 232-25-27 and 232-25-09 and explained that both <br />parcels are zoned entirely General Retail and both parcels are non- <br />conforming now, but will conform to the Zoning Code after the assemblyo <br />Mr. Gorris quesioned if these are assembled and the developer splits <br />off part of the back, would that leave this lot non-conforming, <br />Assistant Law Director Dubelko stated that it would appear that the <br />only issues arefrontage and square footage, and as long as_the develop_er <br />joins the segment to the other parcel and leaves sufficient square <br />footage on this parcel there would be no problem, this would b.e up <br />to the developer. J. Thomas moved to approve the assembly of permanent <br />parcel 232-25-27 to 232-25-09 to create a parcel that conforms to the <br />zoning code, seconded by R. Bowen, and unanimously approved. <br />Therm-All Inc., located on the south side of the North Olmsted Industrial <br />Parkway. <br />Proposal to construct building. <br />Heard by the Architectural Board of Review October 18, 1.989. <br />Mr. Neiden, engineer, presented plans and advised that he had no objec- <br />tion to the Architecrural Board`s suggestion that they use the metal <br />hallite lighting. He explained that this is a whiter light, and the <br />sodium light will give a yellow cast to the building. Regarding the <br />revised landscape plan, Mr. Neiden explained that they are going to <br />stake out the area to be cleared and the forester has agreed to mark <br />4 to 6 trees that he would like to save which they will transplant. <br />B. Gorris moved to approve the Therm-All, Incorporated project located <br />on the south side of the North Olmsted Industrial Parkway, incorporating <br />the recommendations of the Architectural Board of Review, seconded by <br />T. Morgan, and unanimously approved. 3) Chester's Restaurant (Biskind Development Company), Great Northern <br />Corporate Center, Country Club Blvd. <br />Proposal to construct restaurant. <br />Heard by the Architectural Board of Review October 18S 1989. <br />Chairman Thomas stated that the only suggestion. made by the Architectural <br />Board of Review was to change the pin oaks to maple or locust trees. <br />Mr. P1ize, representing Biskind Development Company, stated that they <br />will use the maples, however their landscaper has advised that he has <br />had some trouble with the varities of maples suggested and he does prefer <br />the pin oaks. Mr. Mize pointed out that they have these trees elsewhere <br />and the landscaper. trims them so they do not grow down. The members had
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.