My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06/12/1990 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1990
>
1990 Planning Commission
>
06/12/1990 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:31:39 PM
Creation date
1/29/2019 5:04:47 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1990
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
6/12/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
6
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
stops and excessive turn;ng radii and this configuration appeared <br />to be the most efficient pattern. He further advised that the ' continuous traffic entering the parking area has been satisfactory, in <br />that it keeps cars from stacking in the public streets and that there <br />have been no accidents at those points. It was suggested that an <br />overlay showing the May Company expansion should be submitted to the <br />BZD Committee. , Mr. Thomas noted that this proposal would have to be <br />submitted to the Board of Zoning Appeals for approval bf the <br />size of the garki.ng spaces. T. Morgan moved to approve the proposal for <br />the exterior renovation to the parking area for Great Northern Mall as <br />presented this evening with the stipulation that the new May Company <br />renovation be included in the drawing submitted to the BZD and also to <br />recommend to the Board of Zoning Appeals that the new parking lot size . <br />be approved, seconded by R. Bierman, and unanimously approved. <br />5) Nemeth Commercial Building, 29310 to 29352 Lorain Road. <br />Revised plans to construct addition to parking area. Proposal denied at <br />the meeting of May 8, 1990. <br />Chairman Thomas advised that they have received a copy of a letter from <br />the Law Department to the Ohio Board of Liquor Control dated June l, <br />1990 advising that a resolution had been introduced by Council <br />recommending that the liquor permit for the Star Lounge be revoked. <br />Assistant Law Director Dubelko advised that no hearing date had been set <br />yet by the Board, but the City would be advised and he will notify the <br />Planning Commission. Mr. Thomas pointed out that the purpose of this <br />parking lot expansion was to satisfy the parking requirements of the <br />Star Lounge; if the Star Lounge does lose its license this expansion <br />may not be necessary. Mra Nemeth agreed that if they lost their. <br />license, he would not need the additional parking area. Mr. Bierman <br />pointed out that this was before the Commission because they had been <br />required to add parking by the Building Department, and what would <br />happen if they do not lose the license, or if another bar went into <br />this building. In that case the new owner would have to reduce the <br />number of seats until a parking plan could be approved. Mr. Nemeth <br />stated that the owners of the Star Lounge still owed him some money for <br />the license, so he might take over the operation himself, since when he ' <br />operated it before there had been no complaints; or he might put in a <br />restaurant. He maintains that the present owners are now in a position <br />to hire a security guard and he believes that some of the problems would <br />be over. If he did not take over this business, he believed that the <br />units would remain empty. Mr. Nemeth agreed that it would probably be <br />best to withdraw these plans until there is a decision on the license. <br />IV. NEW DEVELOPMQVTS AND SUBDTVISIONS: <br />1) Mark Edward Laisy Assembly Plat <br />The proposal is to combine permanent parcel nos. 236-11-3 and 236-11-4 <br />into one (1) parcel. Location is the north side of Butternut Ridge <br />Road, west of the cesnetery. Zoning is "A" Residence, Single, entirely, <br />and the.proposal does not, nor did not formerly, conform to the Zoning <br />Code requirement for frontage. Note this this proposal was reviewed by <br />Planning Coirunission on April 24, 1990, and referred to the Board of <br />Zoning Appeals with recoirnnendation to approve the required variance (for <br />contiguous ownership); variance granted. <br />Assistant City Engineer McDermott advised that the variance had been <br />granted. T. Morgan moved to approve the Mar.k Edwarcl Laisy Assembly Plat <br />to combine"permanent parcel nos. 236-11-3 and 236-11=4 into one (1) <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.