09/25/1990 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

i ever will be handling hazardous wastes in the city. Mr. B. Butchko, another officer in the company. explained their procedures and verified that the they have been working with the city on their waste materials for some time. Building Commissioner Conway advised that variances were granted previously, for this proposal, but have now expired. Since the plans now show outdoor storage in the rear, he opted to send the -proposal to the Planning Commission first for their recommendations to the Board.of. Zoning Appeals. R. Butchko clarified that this would not be outdoor storage, i:here would be a separate building. They will still have to renew their previous variances Mr. Butchko, senior, explained that due to the problems of getting a permit for natural gas when they constructed the building, they had to build in conformance with the original foundation on the property, so variances were sought to construct the building. He further advised that since this is the only manufacturing company in North Olmsted, their company has become the model for all regulations for waste water treatment and they have been working with both the E.P.A. and the Waste Water Treatment Plant. It was decided that after the variances were granted, the proposal could be referred directly to the Architectural Board prior to returning to the Commission. T. Morgan moved to refer the Nutron Nameplate proposal to construct an addition to the Architectural Review Board, the Safety Department, and to the. Engineering. Department for their review, and that we. are also recommending to the Board of Zoning Appeals that the variance requested for the side yard and setback as approved by the B.Z.A. on August 2, 1989 be reapproved, seconded by M. Betts, and unanimously approved. N. NEGT DEVELOPMIIVTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: No items. V. COMMiJNICATIONS: Ord. 90-76: This ordinance was approved by the Council without the required referral to the Planning Commission. Mr. Gorris questioned why this was. approved when iL had been decided not to approve any ordinance changing the Zoning Codes until the new.codes were in place. Another proposed ordinance . had been held for that reason. Mr. Conway advised that this ordinance is not exactly what the Planning Review Committee had submitted, pointing out that if this is approved at this time it would be changed again when the Zoning Codes were approved. Mr. Gorris stated that there were proposals that would have helged the Commission procedurally which the-Council refused to pass until the code was approved. He believes, that this too should be held. It was clarified that this change would only apply to subsection (d), . not to the entire section. B. Gorris moved to approve Ord. 90-76, seconded by T. Morgari. Roll ca.ll on motion: Gorris, Morgan, Betts, Bierman,. Orlowski, and Thomas, no. Motion failed to pass. Ord. 90=125: (added to the agenda). Since the Commission has been discussing a new Mixed Use District and Mr. Dubelko has drawn up a proposed ordinance covering it, Mr. Thomas suggested.that the.Commission discuss that prior to discussing the new Zoning Codes. Mr. Gorris believed that the members. should review these codes' at length, and also that he would like to audit the document himself in order to ascertain that it does reflect the suggestions of his committee. He further believes that the Building Commissioner and the Assistant Law Director should also review this ?n depth 2