My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10/09/1990 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1990
>
1990 Planning Commission
>
10/09/1990 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:31:41 PM
Creation date
1/29/2019 5:07:04 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1990
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
10/9/1990
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
8
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
<br />are shown on plan), including all of those in the buffer area. In <br />response to the Chairman's questions, Mr. Bollinger explained that these <br />luxury apartments will be targeted to upper income tenants with rents in <br />the $600.00 to $700.00 range; with a ratio of two to one 2 bedroom units <br />to one bedroom imits; and there will be either a brick or stone <br />treatment on the buildings. Mr. Thoma.s requested that a more in-depth <br />presentation be given, especially considering the impact on the <br />neighborhood. Mr. Bollinger responded that the ingress egress drives <br />would be on both Mastick and Clague Roads, peak times would be normal <br />working hours (7:00 - 8:00 aem. to 4:00 to 6:00 p.m.); major traffic <br />runs north of I-480 to Lorain Road, there will be some impact on the <br />traffic. Mr. Bollinger stated that he was really unprepared to respond <br />to Mr. Thomas's questions, but pointed out that he ha,d submitted <br />everything requested by the Building Commissioner. He explained that the <br />buildings will probably be brick and vinyl siding, he presented a color <br />rendering, but stated that no actual color scheme was decided on; that <br />the clubhouse is for the use of the tenants and no additional parking is <br />provided since it is preswned that tenants will walk there. There will <br />be wood burning fireplaees in the tmits. Building Commissioner Conway <br />verified that there would be a 60 foot set back.off Brookpark, and 20 <br />foot perimeter around the side yards (approximately 60 feet where <br />property is split zoned). He questioned the 39 foot height of the <br />building (35 feet is maximtun); one diunpster is on the residentially <br />zoned land; and no handicapped parking spaces are noted. It was <br />clarified that the variance for 3 stories was only for a 35 foot height, <br />but Mr. Conway wanted this.presented to the Planning Commission. for <br />their recommendation on the height. Mr. Bollinger statecl that they <br />could comply to the 35 foot maximum, but architecturally the steeper <br />roof would be preferable. - Assistant City Engineer McDermott believes <br />there is an error since there is an assembly plat recorded two years ago <br />with additional property to the west and the property,lines shown would <br />not be proper. Mr. Bollinger agreed that there was more property, but it <br />would be for phase two of the development, and they can incorporate that <br />property into these plans. Since this is split zoned property, <br />Assistant Law Director Dubeiko requested that there be restrictive <br />covenants that the single family zoned property must be kept as green <br />area. Mr. Thomas opened up the discussion to the residents. Councilman <br />McKay pointed out that the driveway onto Clague Road would appear to be <br />very close to the intersection and cars could be stacked at the <br />intersection; traffic light for northbound traffic is timed at 13 <br />seconds to allow cars to get onto I-480; he maintained that this <br />development will generate approximately 200 to 250 cars; he requested a _ <br />board an board fence in the buffer and along the access roads. to protect. <br />the residents from noise and lights; suggested that the developers <br />consider access directly onto Brookpark Road; requested that the <br />Engineering Department check the adequacy of the existing storm sewer <br />lines; would prefer to have tmits sold as condominiums; and stated that • <br />because of the odors froan the waste water treatment plant there could be <br />problems renting these imits. Mr. Wasmer, an adjacent neighbor, stated <br />that he would prefer to have condominiimns for a less transit type <br />neighbor; 4 parking spaces for the party center is not adequate since <br />there will be guests; there are few sidewalks in the area; the sewer <br />plant has been an ongoing problem and he believed all that building <br />should be stopped and the sewer plant fixed so that there were no odors. <br />4
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.