10/17/1990 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

.?. stated that there was a problem backing out of the existing parking spaces. Mr. Mongello agreed and stated that they could increase the parking and driveway area to 45 feet. Mr. Johnson explained that their residents were not handicapped but that they did not drive. He believes that they really only need 4 or 5 parking spaces. Mr. Conway stated that the plans should show the 45 foot width with the actual 4 or 5 spaces and-also showing the landbanked spaces. Mr. Gallagher moved to approve the plans as presented with the condition that the actual parking is shown an the plan as 45 feet single lane pa.rking and the the landbanked parking is noted, seconded by Y. Sohn, and unanimously approved. 4) The Chand Building, 30033 Lorain Road. Proposal to construct an office buildingo (Existing house to be demolished). Referred by Planning Commission October 9, 1990. Mr. Cliand, owner, and Mr. Margvilies, designer, presented a revised site plan showing ten landbanked pa.rking spaces (Planning Commission had recommended some landbanked spaces). They have discussed the trees with the Forester and agreed to plant more crabapple trees. Mr. Zergott suggested planting a 2 inch caliper tree, perhaps centurian, instead of the 18 foot tree that is shown; also suggested including junipers along with the contoneaster (perhaps apiculata) to give some green area in the winter; the scotch pine is fine as shown. Members discussed the front area shown with a small planting bed. Mr. Gallagher is concerned that cars will be backing over this area. Mr. Margulies decided that he would move the:building back about 2 feet and leave the curb where it is shown to protect the building. He presented samples of materials: majority of stucco is parchment (#342) with wYiite trim (354); brick on lower level . is General Clay (#350); asphalt roof will be Certainteed Mesquite. There was concern about the location of the dlunpster and enclosure which is , adjacent to the drive. Mr. Conway suggested that there would be room for the dwnpster next to the loading zone which is actually larger than required and would be shielded by the bu.ilding and woul.d only ha.ve to be enclosed on 2 sides with the fence (gate would not be necessary in this location), the stain for the enclosure and the fence on the property line should match the asphalt shingles. The light will be on a 14 foot pole and is shielded from the residential area. Mr. Conway suggested that-they check if there is a drop shield available in case there would be a problem. B. Zergott moved to approve the revised plans as submitted with the recommendation that the building be moved back 2 feet and keeping the curb exactly where it is at to protect.the huilding; that the dumpster will be moved behind the building to the loading area and it should be enclosed on twp sides with a fence stained to match the asphalt shingles, seconded by T. Gallagher, and unanimously approved. 5) Steeple Walk Apartments, property located south of I-480, west of S.R. 252, and north of lots facing Butternut Ridge Road. Revisions to plans previously approved by Planning Commission on December 12, 1989. Referred by Planning Commission October 9, 1990. Mr. Haas, architect, and Mr. Cameratta, developer, presented color rendering, explaining that the materials will be basically the same as what was approved previously. They have made some design changes to the 3