05/14/1991 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

0 June, and ha,s no problem with the Commission setting a deadlinem In response to Mr. Skoulis questions, Mr. McKee advised that the fence could be put up while the other construction is going on; it would take approximately 4 to 5 weeks to get the fence; and 1 week to install it. Mr. Orlowski questioned if they are going to leave the existing glazed brick in the front of the former Chinese Palace unit. Mr. McKee stated that they will be repainting it, and everything is going to match. J. Thomas moved that the Commission approve the Office Warehouse storefront renovation including the addition of the 6 foot board on board fence, as well as the landscaping and including the issues that were brought up by the Board of Zoning Appeals that they required in order to grant the variance and that we require the developer to refer any additional landscaping to a member of the Architectural Review Board, preferably Mr. Zergott, by the time the development is before the B.Z.D. Committee of Council. (It was noted tha,t the Building Comnissioner had not been positive that the chairwomen would hear this proposal, it would depend on the amount of the changes made to the original proposal.) Mr. Mongello pointed out that all of this ties together. He has tried to contact Mrs. Saringer, but he is not sure she will hear it. He questioned if the Commission could make two separate motions, one for the truck dock, the front of Office Warehouse and the fence and the second for the balance of the former Chinese Palace and the Revco units. Mre Thomas does not believe that it would take that much extra time to hear the whole thing, and does not believe that Mrs. Saringer would want to look at two separate issues. Mr. Thomas continued with his motion:e..also that the developer has made a promise that the board on board fence will be constructed as soon as the materials arrive and that a stipulation be made that in case of an unforeseen problem with delivery, shipment, or an act of God, we would require that should the materials be available the fence be installed by August lst, seconded by M. Betts. Mr. Gorris clarified that this would not be a complete fence since there is a portion of a wall. Mr. McKee pointed out that a small section would be new chain link (approximately 40 feet on the southern part), then board on board to the wa.ll and board on board beyond the wall. Mr. Gorris marked this on the plans which will be stamped. The motion was approved tmanimously. 2) Hot `n Now Hamburgers, property located between Jiffy Lube and U Store It. Proposal to construct drive through restaurant. Chairman Gorris pointed out that the agenda is not correct in that the name of Jiffy Lube has been changed. Mr. Vannelli and Mr. Beck, representing the developers, explained this is a national franchise (owned by Pepsi Cola) and there will be 10 stores located on the west side of Cleveland, the North Olmsted store will be the first. This is a twin drive through restaurant and the building is stucco with a standing seam roof. In response to Mr. Thomas's questions, he advised that he did not have the figures on the daily traffic count but would get them. He explained that there would be one lane into the property and two out. Mr. Betts pointed out that at one of the drive through windows a driver would have to reach across the passenger seat to pay for and receive his food. There is no seating in the building. The parking spaces are for employees, but Mr. Thomas believed that customers will eat in the parking lot. Mr. Vannelli stated that statically they do not. There have been marketing studies done, but Mr. Vanelli does not have all the figures. Mr. Orlowski would like some statistics on how many people actually go to the pick up window on the passenger side versus the driver's side window. It was clarified that customers would place their orders at the speaker board and 3