Laserfiche WebLink
., <br />? -At. <br /> <br />After some discussion, the developer decided to withdrawn the proposal in order <br />to decide whether he would request variances from the Board of Zoning Appeals. If <br />variance are granted the proposal must return to the Planning Commission. The <br />proposal was withdrawn by the developer. <br />Haeberle Subdivision. <br />The proposal is to subdivide permanent parcel No. 234-12-14 located on the West <br />side of Barton Road south of Lorain Road, into three (3) sublots. Zoning is "A" <br />Residence, Singie, entirely, and proposed sublot no. 3 does not conform to the <br />Zoning Code Requirement for frontage; proposed sublot noe 2 has insufficient side <br />yard distance. <br />No representative was present. City Engineer Deichmann explained the proposal to <br />divide the property into 3 lots, advising that sublot 3 has only 70.02 foot <br />frontage and does not conform to the "A" Residence requirements (80 feet). There <br />is an existing house on sublot 2 which has 94.96 foot frontage but the garage is <br />only 3.6 feet off the side property line instead of 5 as required. Adjacent <br />residents, Mr. Fu1op and Mr. Juliano, objected to the subdivision on the basis <br />that the lots were too small, Mra Fulop's property is adjacent to the non- <br />conforminv lot. J. 'I'homas moved to approve the Haeberle Subdivision proposal to <br />subdivide permanent parcel no. 234-12-14, located on the west side of Barton Road <br />south of Lorain Road, into three (3) sublots. Zoning is "A" Residence, Single, <br />entirely, and proposed su.blot no. 3 does not conform to. the Zoning Code <br />requirement for frontage; proposed sublot no. 2 has insufficient side yard <br />distance, seconded by B. Gorrise Roll call on motion: Thomas, Gorris, Bowen, <br />Hughes, Morgan, Orlowski, and Skoulis no. Motion failed to pass. J. Thomas moved <br />to refer the Haberle Subdivision proposal to subdivide permanent parcel noa 234- <br />12-14 to the Board of Zoning Appeals, seconded by B. Gorris, and unanimously <br />approved. <br />BUILDING DEPARTMIINT REQUESTS: <br />View Point at North Olmsted Golf Course, located west off Canterbury Road and <br />south of Butternut Ridge Road and I-480. (Heard under Section IV., itesn 1). <br />Proposal to construct cluster homes. <br />Tabled at Planning Commission meeting of September 24, 1991. <br />NEW DEVEL,OPMIIQTS AND SUBDIVISIONS: <br />View Point at North Olmsted Golf Course Rezoning Request. <br />The proposal is to rezone North Olmsted Golf Course, located west off Canterbury <br />Road and south of Butternut Ridge Road and I-480, from an existing zone of "A" <br />Residence, Single, entirely, to a proposed zone of Single Family Cluster. <br />Tabled at Planning Commission meeting of September 24, 1991. <br />Mr. Bower, Shore West Construction, explained that they ha.ve combined the <br />entrance to the Vista Homes with the entrance to the Golf Homes and parking area <br />thus eliminating the entrance at Butternut Ridge and Canterbury. Members agreed <br />it was an attractive solution. Mro Bower explained that reports have been <br />submitted to the Engineering Department regarding the traffic study, sanitary and <br />storm sewers, storm water retention, and water lines. A traffic light would be <br />warranted at Butternut Ridge and Canterbury after the cluster home traffic is <br />added. He maintained that there are adequate sanitary sewers, - out flow for a <br />storm sewer system and water pressure are sufficient. Mr. Bender, their engineer, <br />was present to answer any questions. City Engineer DeichmaTm stated he had just <br />received these reports and his department has not had a chance to study them in <br />detail, but there are a few preliminary questions at this point. On the traffic <br />study, what were the weather conditions at the time of the study (if the traffic <br />2