05/01/1991 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

?--, overage on a1l, the signage was not totaled since there are actually 5 separate buildings, the signage for each tenant was considered separately. Mr. Gareau cautioned that since they have opened up the Brookpark access,. this property is now considered a through lot and a 50 foot setback would be required on Brookpark Road if they ever planned to expand. The members agreed that this is an improvement. Mr. Restifo advised that the requests would.be broken down into 4 separate motions. B. Grace moved to grant the 34 foot front setback vaxiance to construct a building; to grant the variance for 82 less parking spaces than required (this :is 12 parking spaces less non-conforming than what is existing now); and to grant a variance for a loading zone in front setback, seconded by T. Restifo, and unanimously approved. B. Grace moved to grant the request for 3 pole signs on property (4 pole signs are now existing, 1 is allowed); to grant the request for a 173 square foot variance for sign area of main shopping center pole sign and a 183.5 square foot variance for supports and trim of pole sign, seconded by J. Ms.loriey, and lmanimously approved. B. Grace moved to grant a variance for 112 square foot variance for total sign area of ground sign and 54 squa.re foot variance for trim, seconded by E. Gallagher, and unanimously approved. B._ Grace moved to grant the request for variance for wall signs fo'r individual buildings as ha.s been explai.ned to the Building Department in writing, seconded by T. Restifo, and unanimously approved. Building Commission Conway advised'that there is also a variance-for not havi.ng a 7 foot buffer,strip .on Brookpark Road whi"ch, was eliminated from the agenda, but is on their request. It was noted that this was a violation of Ord. 87-93, Section 1161.10(e). B. Grace moved to grant a variance for the establishment and maintenance of a.7 foot buffer zone ori the south side of the property, seconded by T. Restifo, and unanimously approved. Variances granted. 10. Mr. and Mrs. Lee 4602 Ranchview Avenue. Request for variance (1123.12). - Request 20 foot rear yard variance to install patio enclosure. Violation of Ord. 87-93, Section 1135.08(a). . Also request special permit to add to nori-conforming dwelling. Special permit required Ord. 87-93, Section 1165.02. Vice Chairman Restifo called all interested .parties before the Board. Mr. Lee and Mr. Sindelar, contractor, explained that they would like to install a 16 by 10 foot porch enclosure, and the rear lot was at present less than the 50 foot required. J. Maloney moved to grant the variance to Mr., and Mrs. Lee, 4602 Ranchview Avenue for a- 20 foot rear yard variance.to install patio enclosure; also to grant a special permit to add to a non-conforming dwelling, seconded by B. Grace, and tmanimously approved. Variance and special permit granted. 11. Jack and Guna Foraker, 6100 Barton Road.. Request for variance 1123.12). 'Request 6 foot, 4 inch variance for distance between dwelling (porch roof) and garage. Violation of Ord. 87-93, Section 1135.02(c)1. , Vice Chairman Restifo called all interestecl-pa.rties before the Board. Mr. and Mrs. Foraker explained that they' wanted to put a roof over a new deck and an existing deck. The roof will be no closer than'the existing deck. In response to Mr._Grace's question, Building Commissioner Conway stated that with an open structure the fire rating is not necessary. E. Gallagher moved to grant the variance requested for Mr. and Mrs. Foracker, 6100 Barton Road, for a 6 foot, 4 inch variance for,the distance between a dwelling (porch roof) and garage, seconded by B. Grace, and unanimously approved. Variance granted. 5