Laserfiche WebLink
, <br />. ,, <br />also maintained that this complex will generate far less traffic than the Christ <br />The King proposal. He presented renderings of the development sign, site plan, <br />and elevations of the buildings and explained that the site itself was <br />irregularly shaped and has two existing roads, the 30 foot wide street comin.g off <br />Barton and Matthew Drive,. the "U" shaped street, neither of which will be <br />changed. He maintained that with the interstate and the high tension lines this <br />area creates a good transition to the single family homes along Barton Road. The <br />densi.ty of the project will be less than 5 units per acre. He presented <br />renderings of 3 attached models; a ca.pe cod, a ranch, and a 2 story, all of them <br />will be 22 feet wide, and explained that these units will be interchangeable thus <br />giving a variety to the streetscape. The minimtun distance between the buildings <br />will be 20 feet, many buildings will have more. The ranch will have 980 square <br />feet (60 feet deep), with a cathedral ceiling and a 10 by 20 foot ?arage; the 12 <br />story model has a cathedral eeiling over the stairs, 3 bedrooms, 22 baths, and a <br />10 by 20 foot garage in the front; and the two story unit will ha.ve 1550 square <br />feet, 3 bedrooms, and 2 2 baths. He advised that they have designed a similar <br />project recently, and the first phase of 75 units was opened this last Saturday <br />and 58 units have been sold; it is expected that the balance will be sold by the <br />end of the week. The single family detached tmi.t is a ranch style (57 feet deep <br />and 37 feet wide), with 1,224 square feet, a garage in front, a cathedral <br />ceiling, and 2 bedrooms and 2 baths. This tmit can also be interchanged with the <br />some of the attached unitso Mr. Grendell called attention to a report submitted <br />by Mr. Robert Hill, a City Planner, which concluded, ...it is my opinion that <br />two-unit attached and detached residential use represents a reasonable and <br />appropriate arrangement for the subject property. Such use is also consistent <br />with the current mixed use zoninu of the property. With the Planning Gonunission's <br />approval, the Hennie Homes proposal could proceed tmder the applicable current <br />Mixed Use provisions of the Zoning Code." Mr. Grendell pointed out that Mr. Hill <br />ha,d been involved in the development of the City's Zoning Code. He also stated <br />that Mr. Hill's traffic analysis estimated that this proposal would generate <br />1,795 trips per day in contrast with the Christ The King proposal which would <br />have generated 4,550 trips. Mr. Grendell estimated that this proposal.would add <br />35 million dollars to the ta.x rolls of North Olmsted since the tmits would be in <br />the $100,000.00 to $125,000.00 range and compared that to the previously <br />mentioned Pebblebrook Farms in which the units were originally marketed in that <br />same range and are now averaging in excess of $135,000.00 and some are in the <br />$175,000.00 to $185,000.00 range. A further benefit would be that these young <br />families and empty nesters would not necessarily place as much of a burden on the <br />school systems. He advised that this submittal of preliminary plans is the first <br />of a two step process as required in Section 1149.07; next, the detailed <br />development plans will be presented as prescribed in Section 1149.08e Some of the <br />information presented tonight is actualTy required in the detailed development <br />plans. He quoted the Section 1149.03 (c) which stated the Planning Commission's <br />authority to approve various uses, and the gvidelines for those approvalse He <br />maintained that this use is far less injurious than other u.ses allowed in this <br />district and less than what was previously approved for Christ The King. It was <br />clarified that this property is Mi.xed Use "C" by virtue of the new Zoning Code, <br />but was formerly Mixed Use "B". Chairman Gorris questioned if Building <br />Commissioner Conway would foresee any problems with the intermingling of attached <br />and detached housing. Mro Conway responded that there would be no problem with <br />the use, both would be allowed. Mr. Grendell stated that the developers thought <br />that the City might prefer some detached units, especially to the east. In <br />reference to the screening from I-480, he stated that they preferred to to use <br />mounding and trees, not a long wall as a noise barrier. Mr. Grendell clarified <br />2