04/14/1992 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

developing offices at this time because of economic the necessity of spending money on another planni whether or not enough information had been present( Skoulis questioned if the City has a right to pre) in the restaurants Lmtil the other buildings arE construed as denying him his right to develop hiE that the developer does not have an absolute ri.ght states the Commission may permit phase developmen which stated that a parcel in the Mixed Use Distr i.f approved by the Planning Commission. Mre Gorri., this size it would be difficult to develop it at i Commission would have the right to dictate that, approved, the development of the third service use substantial compliance in the development of officE that the same standards would apply, the code suggE on detailed development plan approval, and perhaps again he wotil.d suspect that if they were shown integrated into the proposal and if enough info might be approved., Mr. Skoulis stated that it mal market for office buildings, so how can they de believed that this is the key, to carry out development for an office facility or an hotel. T] is no market, but a new building is being proposE tho intarr•hanaa anrl ha }1Pl'IPiTPfi tl-hat tO Y_AkP_ 2 DL conditions, and he questioned r. The members were not sure d to make a determination. Mr. ent the developer from putting presented and could that be land. Mr. Dubelko responded to phase development, the code _. He read Section 1149.04(a) Cct may be developed by phases speculated that with a parcel ne time. He questioned if the if these two restaurants are be delayed until there is some buildings. Mr. Dubelko stated sts that conditions can be put that could be a condition, but that the third building was nnation had been presented it be 20 years before there is a iy the restaurants. Mr. Hill the intent of the Mixed Use iis developer stated that there d for the opposite quadrant of ime area and waste it on three restaurant faci:lities does not make sense. He maintai.ned that the Corporate Center was integrated in that after the offices were built, Chester's was proposed. This parcel could support the restaurants if they were there to serve the basic use of this Mixed Use Districto He is concerned that this direction and focus could change with the approval of three restaurants. He questioned if Moen was shown the restaurant parcel. Mr. Gavin objected to N1r. Hill's questioning the chair, and pointed out that he had been a consultant for the City. Mr. Hill responded that he no longer was a consultant for the City. There was then another discussion about what parcel the Moen people were shown. Mr. Skoulis stated that Chester's restaurant and the Radisson Hotel do not just •service the Corporate Center since customers come from all over, and there was no intent for these restaurants to merely service Parcel "B", most of the business will be from outside of the area. Mr. Hill stated that this integration is more physical, and questioned if an office should be nExt to three restaurants, and a designed physical integration would be office/ restaurant/office. Mr. Orlowski responded that perhaps the City did want office/restaurant/office building, and believed that the code now gives mre latitude. Mrs. Kreji, a resident of Colunbia Road, stated that no one has considered the residents, she was concerned about what she will see across I=480, garbage barrels, signs, etc. She was also concerned about traffic. She believed that up until Janua.ry this parcEl was residential. It was clar'ified that only the portion of the_parcel facing ColUmbia Road was rezoned fran residential, this portion has always been Mixed Use. Mr. Gorris explained the location of the proposal, the subdivision, and the plans showing the screen walls for the dumpsters. She still maintained that_ the residents should be considered, not just the developers. After some d.iscussion, it was decided to request that the County Planning Commission review this proposal in connection with the master plan study, and copies of all plans.and Mr.. Hills report wi.ll be forwarded to them. B. Gorris moved to forward this proposal to the County Planning Commission; who is working an the master plan at this time, so they can look at this parcel and advise if in their.opinion, the Commission ha.s looked at 11