Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />improvements, the existing radius does not conform to engineering standards. <br />At Silverdale and Duane there is a small, paved corner of the intersection which <br />has never been dedicated. He presented a plat showing these areas. R. Bowen moved <br />to approve the Silverdale and Duane Road Right of Way Dedication Plats (2). The <br />proposals, by the City, are to accept for right of way dedication, small portions <br />of permanent parcel nos. 232-23-22 (Duane and Silverdale Road intersection), and <br />232-28-54 and 232-28-55 (Lorain and Silverdale Roads intersection); which are <br />needed for roadway improvements, seconded by J. Thomas, and unanimously approved. <br />2) North Olmsted Industrial Park Resubdivision. <br />Heard earlier in the meeting. <br />V. COMMUNICATIONS: <br />A letter to Mr. Morgan was signed by the members and will be mailed to him. <br />VI. CONIMITTEE REPORTS: <br />No items. <br />VII. NFW BUSINESS: <br />No items. <br />VIII. OLD BUSINESS: <br />Ord. 92-58: Carried over from meeting of July 14th which was cancelled. <br />This ordinance is amending Section ,1135.02 of the City of North Olmsted, entitled <br />Recreational Vehicles. Building Commission Conway explained that the way the <br />ordinance is written now, no vehicle over 18 foot can be stored on a property and <br />then storage was only allowed in the rear yard. Approximately 10 to 15% of the <br />properties within North Olmsted have some sort of recreational vehicle and <br />storage of these vehicles was previously allowed with.certain restrictions. This <br />ordinance will allow vehicles in the side yard as long as there are no windows on <br />that side of the adjacent house, if there is a window on the side in a livable <br />area, a vehicle would have to be stored in the reax yarda The 20% coverage <br />limitation on structures in the rear yard would inciude any recreational vehicle <br />which was stored there, and the vehicle would have to be located at least as far <br />away from the side and rear property lines as its length, thus if a person ha.d a <br />30 foot trailer there would have to be at least a 70 foot reax yard and the <br />vehicle be in the middle of the yard. This ordinance limits outside storage to 2 <br />vehicles (any ntnnber theoretically can be stored inside). The members are <br />concerned that this ordinance will encourage residents to store vehicles on their <br />property. Mr. Conway pointed out that there is a problem since many residents <br />have been storing vehicles on their property for?the last 20 years, and now it is <br />prohibited. Mr. Bowen suggested that these vehieles should'be grandfathered in. <br />It was clarified that the 18 foot limitation eliminated practically all drivable <br />recreational vehicles. Several residents were present for this issue. Mr. Fox <br />explained that he advised when he bought his trailer that he could store it on <br />his property, so he has poured concrete for it. Very few people can put boats or. <br />campers in the back yard because side yards are not wide "enough. Since the City <br />only cites residents after a complaint is ma.de, one resident who was forced to <br />move his vehicle, made a practice of driving around and complaining against any <br />violation he saw. He pointed out that there is a size limitation on garages, so <br />buildi.ng a garage for a large vehicle is frequently impossible. He maintained <br />that the storage lots are not secure. He realized tha.t some restrictions are <br />necessary, but few yards could aceommodate a large vehicle lmder these <br />gui.delines. He further stated that even a 20 or 24 foot vehicle was small. He <br />might use a storage area in North Olmsted if it were totally secure and was <br />5