My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
07/28/1992 Minutes
Document-Host
>
City North Olmsted
>
Boards and Commissions
>
1992
>
1992 Planning Commission
>
07/28/1992 Minutes
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
2/4/2019 12:32:09 PM
Creation date
1/29/2019 6:16:02 AM
Metadata
Fields
Template:
N Olmsted Boards & Commissions
Year
1992
Board Name
Planning Commission
Document Name
Minutes
Date
7/28/1992
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
9
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
k <br />prohibitively expensive. Mr. Stein, an owner of a 30 foot motor home, advised <br />that in order to comply, he would have to remove his trees and landscaping and <br />and pour a concrete pad that would run from the front of his home to the back of <br />his lot.- He questioned if it would not be better for his neighbor to look at his <br />motor home parked in front of his garage, than to look at it in the middle of a <br />? yard «ith no landscaping. It was pointed out that under the existing ordinance he <br />could not have his vehicle on his property at all. Since Council has the final <br />vote on this ordinance which does not seem to answer the needs of the residents <br />who own recreational vehicles, Mr. Thomas suggested that there should be further <br />study by Council. J. Thomas moved to recommend that Council continue to review <br />this ordinance and have some kind of a public forum wherein owners of <br />recreational vehicles can appear and state their concerns and needs so that <br />Council can come up with an ordinance that will have the least impact on the <br />comnunity, seconded by K. 0'Rourke, and unanimously approved. <br />Study of the Master Plan: <br />Chairman Gorris advised that any member who had not submitted his list of <br />recomnendations for the 32 parcels of vacant land should mail them directly to <br />County Planning Commissiona Mr. Schultz, Ms. Kulikowski, and Mr. Tressler, all of <br />C.P.C. made the presentation. Mr. Schultz advised that the information pertaining <br />to pedestrian overpasses which was menti:oned in connection with Crocker Stearns <br />Road, including the cost estimates, had been sent to the members. He presented <br />copies of an Overview Of the American Disabilities Act Of 1990 (ADA) - Aspects On <br />New Construction, Additions and Alterations and advised that this was passed in <br />1990, some portions jvent into effect in Janua.ry and other portions went into <br />effect last weekend. He explained that tonight's discussion (item IX of the time <br />line) would center on focus area C23 (STEARNS ROAD DEVELOPAM ANALYSIS FOCUS <br />ARFA C-2. Ms. Kulikowski presented slides of the area involved which mainly <br />showed how close the existing homes would be to the proposed road and poiiited out <br />that since widening the road to four lanes would change the character of the <br />area, the zoning should not remain Single Family. Because most of these lots are <br />deep there is an option of moving the homes back or, more feasibly, developing <br />the land for a different use. Table 1 of the DEVELOPMIIVT INIPACT ANALYSIS STEARNS <br />ROAD (SOUTH OF LORAIN) SUMMARY TABLE compared various uses for this area and <br />showed compatibility to surrounding di5tricts, traffic, sewage flow, rnnnber of <br />new residents, rnimber of school children, revenues generated, and expenditures <br />that would be needed to support each use. A new zoning classification, a <br />Residential/ Professional (R.P.O.) District wherein a home could be converted to <br />an office use with no substantial changes being made to the exterior and with a <br />small amount of parking added, cotild contain a compatible mix of office and homes <br />and might be suitable for this area. The major drawback being a larger amount of <br />traffic generated especially with driveways so close together, and other negative <br />factors such as lights, trucks, etc. would have to be regUlated by code. Other <br />options, 3 or 5 story office buildings, 3 story garden apartments, Single Family <br />Cluster units, and retail development were comparedo The R.P.O. District and <br />Single Family Ciuster zoning were the most compatible uses with the surrounding <br />residential areas and the retail use was the least compatible. There could be a <br />mix of R.P.O. and Single Family Cluster projects. She was not sure when the <br />widening of Stearns Road would be started. It was noted that an office building <br />use woul.d be the most lucrative for the home owners; however, with today's <br />market, the amount of office space available, the amount of land zoned for office <br />at present, and the cost of buying the homes, rezoning to an office district <br />might not be feasibleo It was further suggested that some kind of transitional <br />use for the land should be considered until the cons.truction work is done; and <br />that, since the lots are deep, a ring road might be constructed for access to <br />6
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.