07/28/1992 Minutes - Laserfiche WebLink

Home Browse Search

r whatever might be constructed. Ms. Kulikowski advised that there would be about 40 acres after the right of way is taken out; the size would be similar to the Christ-The-King property, but would be adjacent to a heavily travelled road instead-of an internal roado The area closer to Lorain might be suitable for senior housing, cluster.homes would need buffering along Stearns Road, there is no specific R.P.O. Zoning in the present zoning codes. The members are concerned that the R.P.O. zoning could cause problems since developers could ask for zoning changes later on. The members agreed that a specific overall plan for future development would be best, rather than a piecemeal development, and also agreed that cluster homes would be the least objectionable use, not only for the surrounding areas, but for the residents of Stearns Road who did not want to leave. It was noted that to rezone for garden apartments would require a referendum. If, at a later date, the market changes a developer could always ask for a rezoning. Mr. Schultz suggested that an overlay zoning which would govern a home being converted to a business use would give the property owners more flexibility. This area could always be left open and noted as a transitional zone on the ma.ster plan tmtil City officials ha.d a chance to meet with the home owners for their input. The members agreed that retail or 5 story office buildings would be undesirable. Councilwoman Bahas asked if any study ha.d been done on how large tracts of land are acquired by a developer. Mr. Schultz responded that, in this type of case, frequently a developer or a group of developers acquire options on the properties at whatever cost the market would d.ictate. Mr. Cummings, resident of Stearns, is concerned that changing to cluster homes would not be feasible since the cost of buying their properties would be prohibitive. He has not been approached by any developers yet, but his home had been appraised 3 years ago for about 90,000. Before discussing the next area, Mr. Tressler advised that they have presented a duplicate of the colored map to the Engineering Department and other copies could be purchased. He then went on to discuss focus area "D", the western end of the City, and the Lorain Road corridor in particular, from the western end of Stearns Road to the Corporate li.nee He presented slides of what is existing: some large home, a condemned home, homes converted to business use (statistics on table 1), shopping centers, new office buildings, churches, and the Industrial Park which is mostly not developedo He presented the facts stated in the report titled CITY OF NORTFi OLMSTED NIASTER PLAN FOCUS AREA "D" and explained Maps 1 and 2 showing the existing land use and Maps 3 and 4 showing the existing zoning. He pointed out that there are 4.7 million square feet of connnercial space in North Olmsted, with a 2.4 percent vacancy rate as of February which is extremely low. North Olmsted has more commercial space (excluding office areas) than all of downtown Cleveland. Approximately half of the comnercial space is along LOrain Road and 20% of this Lorain Road commercial area is in Focus Area "D". There are 123 acres zoned for General Retail which are not being used for General Retail (95 acres are in Focus Area "D"). Based.an those figures they have calculated (using a moderate standaxd, not the max;m,m) that approximately 1 million square feet of additional commercial development could be built on Lorain Road in Focus Area "D" wYiich could generate 33,400 additional vehicle trips per day. Also there are 80 acres.of Industrially zoned land which is not being used. Several recommendation were listed to improve the aesthetics of the area and others to enconrage the development of the North Ol.msted Industrial Park (page 15). He mentioned the Plain Dealer proposal heard at the beginnin_g of the meeting and questioned if this was the ki.nd of construction and business that was needed in the park. When tax incentives are offered, it would not be unreasonable to demand quality building materials. If, as proposed, the Uus gaxage is re-located to the rear of the park, an alternate road should be considered since. this traffic could inhibit future development. Along with.these main points other suggestions for the construction and ma.intenance of the Industrial Park were 7